Knuiman Matthew W, Hung Joseph, Divitini Mark L, Davis Timothy M, Beilby John P
School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Apr;16(2):235-41. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832955fc.
To investigate the prognostic importance of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Prospective cohort study.
The study was based on 10-year follow-up of 3041 men and women aged 25-84 years without CVD or diabetes who participated in the 1994/1995 Busselton Health Survey. Hazards ratio (HRs) from Cox regression models were used to describe the effect of the MetS as a dichotomous classification and as the number of risk components on incident coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and all CVD events.
All cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors studied showed a strong association with the number of MetS risk components. The age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HR for the MetS was 1.70 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-2.51) for incident CHD but this was reduced to almost unity after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors or the homoeostasis model assessment measure of insulin resistance. However, the number of MetS risk components remained significant (P<0.01) with those having 3+ risk components with a three-fold increase in risk compared with those with no risk components (adjusted HR: 3.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-8.99).
Consideration of the number of MetS risk components seems to be more informative than the (dichotomous) MetS classification when determining risk in clinical practice. Identification of people without any MetS risk components is clinically valuable, as these people seem to have a substantially reduced risk of developing CHD.
探讨代谢综合征(MetS)对心血管疾病(CVD)发病的预后重要性。
前瞻性队列研究。
该研究基于对3041名年龄在25 - 84岁、无CVD或糖尿病的男性和女性进行的10年随访,这些参与者参加了1994/1995年的巴瑟尔顿健康调查。Cox回归模型的风险比(HRs)用于描述MetS作为二分分类以及风险成分数量对冠心病(CHD)、中风和所有CVD事件发病的影响。
所研究的所有心血管和代谢危险因素均与MetS风险成分数量密切相关。MetS对于CHD发病的年龄和性别调整后的HR为1.70(95%置信区间:1.15 - 2.51),但在调整心血管危险因素或胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估指标后,该值降至几乎为1。然而,MetS风险成分数量仍然具有显著意义(P<0.01),与无风险成分者相比,有3个及以上风险成分者的风险增加了两倍(调整后HR:3.59,95%置信区间:1.43 - 8.99)。
在临床实践中确定风险时,考虑MetS风险成分数量似乎比(二分的)MetS分类更具信息量。识别没有任何MetS风险成分的人具有临床价值,因为这些人患CHD的风险似乎大幅降低。