Suppr超能文献

住院医师培训项目的选拔标准:一项全国项目主任调查的结果

Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey.

作者信息

Green Marianne, Jones Paul, Thomas John X

机构信息

Augusta Webster MD Office of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Ward Bldg. 1-003, 303 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):362-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the relative importance of criteria used for residency selection in 21 medical specialties given current available data and competitiveness of specialties.

METHOD

In 2006, questionnaires were distributed to 2,528 program directors in university hospital or university-affiliated community hospital residency programs across 21 medical specialties. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale of importance. Mean values for each item were calculated within and across all specialties. Mean scores for item responses were used to create rank orders of selection criteria within the specialties. To facilitate comparisons, specialties were grouped according to the percentages of positions filled with U.S. medical school graduates.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 49%. With the data from all specialties pooled, the top five selection criteria were (1) grades in required clerkships, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, (3) grades in senior electives in specialty, (4) number of honors grades, and (5) USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score.

CONCLUSIONS

The top academic selection criteria are based on clinical performance, with the exception of USMLE Step 1 score. Indicators that reflect excellence in clinical performance are valued across the specialties by residency program directors regardless of competitiveness within the specialty. USMLE Step 2 CK ranks higher in the less competitive specialties, whereas research experience is more prominent in the most competitive specialties. The Medical Student Performance Evaluation was ranked lowest of all criteria by the program directors.

摘要

目的

根据当前可得数据及各专业的竞争程度,评估用于21个医学专业住院医师选拔标准的相对重要性。

方法

2006年,向21个医学专业的大学医院或大学附属医院住院医师培训项目的2528名项目主任发放问卷。使用5分李克特重要性量表记录回答。计算所有专业内部及之间各项目的平均值。项目回答的平均分数用于确定各专业选拔标准的排名顺序。为便于比较,根据美国医学院毕业生所占职位百分比对各专业进行分组。

结果

总体回复率为49%。汇总所有专业的数据后,排名前五的选拔标准为:(1)必修临床实习成绩,(2)美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步成绩,(3)专业高级选修课程成绩,(4)优异成绩数量,(5)USMLE第二步临床知识(CK)成绩。

结论

除USMLE第一步成绩外,首要的学术选拔标准基于临床能力。无论专业竞争程度如何,反映临床能力卓越的指标在各专业中都受到住院医师培训项目主任的重视。USMLE第二步CK成绩在竞争较小的专业中排名较高,而研究经历在竞争最激烈的专业中更为突出。项目主任将医学生表现评估排在所有标准的最后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验