Suppr超能文献

SELECT 研究方案:一项英国医学生选择进入临床学术培训的序贯混合方法研究。

Protocol for the SELECT study: a sequential mixed methods study of the selection of UK medical students into clinical academic training.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06065-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internationally, there has been a move towards fostering diverse healthcare workforces that are representative of the patient populations they serve. Selection criteria for academic-clinicians often aim to capture skills and attributes that demonstrate both clinical and academic excellence. Currently, it is not known whether the selection criteria for early academic-clinical careers advantage or disadvantage certain ethnic or socioeconomic groups. The UK has a structured route of integrated clinical academic training with entry level training for newly qualified doctors administered through the 'Specialised Foundation Programme' which provides protected time for research within the first two years of postgraduate clinical training. In this study, we aim to identify what selection criteria are used within the UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and how these relate to demographic factors.

METHODS

We will perform a mixed methods study consisting of a document analysis of person specifications and selection criteria used in the 2024 UK Specialised Foundation Programme, and a national cross-sectional survey of current medical students in the UK. We will obtain the person specifications, selection criteria, white space (open ended questions used during shortlisting) and interview questions and mark schemes from each Specialised Unit of Applications via information available on their websites or through Freedom of Information requests. Our survey will collect information relating to demographic data, selection criteria, and perceptions of specialised foundation programme selection.

DISCUSSION

International literature has demonstrated inequity in academic markers used in selection of post-graduate clinicians and that disadvantages caused by selection can compound over time. As such it is important to understand what inequity exists within the selection of early academic-clinicians, as this can help inform more equitable selection practices and help nurture a more diverse academic-clinical workforce.

摘要

背景

在国际上,人们一直在努力培养多元化的医疗保健队伍,使其能够代表他们所服务的患者群体。学术临床医生的选拔标准通常旨在捕捉既能体现临床卓越又能体现学术卓越的技能和特质。目前,尚不清楚学术临床早期职业的选拔标准是否有利于或不利于某些族裔或社会经济群体。英国拥有一个结构化的综合临床学术培训途径,新合格医生的入门级培训通过“专门基础计划”进行管理,该计划在研究生临床培训的头两年内为研究提供了受保护的时间。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定英国专门基础计划中使用了哪些选拔标准,以及这些标准与人口统计因素的关系。

方法

我们将进行一项混合方法研究,包括对 2024 年英国专门基础计划中使用的人员规范和选拔标准进行文件分析,以及对英国目前的医学生进行全国性横断面调查。我们将从每个专门应用单元通过其网站上提供的信息或通过信息自由请求获得人员规范、选拔标准、空白(在入围过程中使用的开放式问题)以及面试问题和评分方案。我们的调查将收集与人口统计数据、选拔标准以及对专门基础计划选拔的看法相关的信息。

讨论

国际文献表明,在研究生临床医生选拔中使用的学术指标存在不平等现象,而且由于选拔造成的劣势会随着时间的推移而加剧。因此,了解早期学术临床医生选拔中存在的不平等现象非常重要,因为这有助于告知更公平的选拔实践,并有助于培养更多元化的学术临床劳动力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Unwelcome changes to the Specialised Foundation Programme recruitment.专科基础培训计划招聘出现了不受欢迎的变化。
Lancet. 2024 Apr 6;403(10434):1333. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00418-5. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验