Labruna Marcelo B, Naranjo Victoria, Mangold Atilio J, Thompson Carolina, Estrada-Peña Agustín, Guglielmone Alberto A, Jongejan Frans, de la Fuente José
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Feb 25;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-46.
The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, economically impact cattle industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The morphological and genetic differences among R. microplus strains have been documented in the literature, suggesting that biogeographical and ecological separation may have resulted in boophilid ticks from America/Africa and those from Australia being different species. To test the hypothesis of the presence of different boophilid species, herein we performed a series of experiments to characterize the reproductive performance of crosses between R. microplus from Australia, Africa and America and the genetic diversity of strains from Australia, Asia, Africa and America.
The results showed that the crosses between Australian and Argentinean or Mozambican strains of boophilid ticks are infertile while crosses between Argentinean and Mozambican strains are fertile. These results showed that tick strains from Africa (Mozambique) and America (Argentina) are the same species, while ticks from Australia may actually represent a separate species. The genetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA and microsatellite loci were not conclusive when taken separately, but provided evidence that Australian tick strains were genetically different from Asian, African and American strains.
The results reported herein support the hypothesis that at least two different species share the name R. microplus. These species could be redefined as R. microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (for American and African strains) and probably the old R. australis Fuller, 1899 (for Australian strains), which needs to be redescribed. However, experiments with a larger number of tick strains from different geographic locations are needed to corroborate these results.
牛蜱微小扇头蜱(Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus)对世界热带和亚热带地区的养牛业造成经济影响。文献中已记录了微小扇头蜱菌株之间的形态和遗传差异,这表明生物地理和生态隔离可能导致来自美洲/非洲的扇头蜱与来自澳大利亚的扇头蜱为不同物种。为验证不同扇头蜱物种存在这一假说,我们在此进行了一系列实验,以表征来自澳大利亚、非洲和美洲的微小扇头蜱之间杂交的繁殖性能,以及来自澳大利亚、亚洲、非洲和美洲的菌株的遗传多样性。
结果表明,澳大利亚与阿根廷或莫桑比克的扇头蜱菌株杂交不育,而阿根廷和莫桑比克菌株杂交可育。这些结果表明,来自非洲(莫桑比克)和美洲(阿根廷)的蜱菌株为同一物种,而来自澳大利亚的蜱可能实际上代表一个单独的物种。单独进行线粒体12S和16S rDNA以及微卫星位点的遗传分析尚无定论,但提供了证据表明澳大利亚蜱菌株在基因上与亚洲、非洲和美洲菌株不同。
本文报道的结果支持以下假说,即至少有两个不同物种共用微小扇头蜱这一名称。这些物种可重新定义为微小扇头蜱(Canestrini,1887)(用于美洲和非洲菌株),可能还有旧的澳大利亚扇头蜱(Fuller,1899)(用于澳大利亚菌株),这需要重新描述。然而,需要用来自不同地理位置的更多蜱菌株进行实验来证实这些结果。