Suppr超能文献

身体形态评估2.0版(BMA 2.0)的开发:信效度检验

The development of the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): tests of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Stewart Tiffany M, Allen H Raymond, Han Hongmei, Williamson Donald A

机构信息

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

出版信息

Body Image. 2009 Mar;6(2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

Abstract

This study tested the psychometric characteristics of the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0). A sample of 563 adults composed of four groups classified by gender and ethnicity (Caucasian men and women and African-American men and women) were studied. Support for the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the BMA 2.0 was found for both men and women. A study of convergent validity was conducted. The BMA 2.0 was found to have adequate reliability and validity. Norms were established for the BMA 2.0 estimates of current body size (CBS), ideal body size (IBS), and acceptable body size (ABS) for Caucasian and African-American men and women. In summary, the BMA 2.0 is a reliable and valid computerized measure of CBS, IBS, ABS, the CBS-IBS discrepancy (body dissatisfaction), and provides an estimate of over/underestimation of body size as compared to individuals of the same sex and body mass index.

摘要

本研究测试了身体形态评估2.0版(BMA 2.0)的心理测量学特征。研究样本包括563名成年人,他们按性别和种族分为四组(白人男性和女性以及非裔美国男性和女性)。研究发现,BMA 2.0在男性和女性中均具有内部一致性和重测信度。进行了收敛效度研究。结果发现,BMA 2.0具有足够的信度和效度。为白人和非裔美国男性及女性的BMA 2.0当前身体尺寸(CBS)、理想身体尺寸(IBS)和可接受身体尺寸(ABS)估计值建立了常模。总之,BMA 2.0是一种可靠且有效的计算机化测量工具,可用于测量CBS、IBS、ABS、CBS - IBS差异(身体不满意程度),并能估计与同性及相同体重指数个体相比身体尺寸的高估/低估情况。

相似文献

1
The development of the Body Morph Assessment version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): tests of reliability and validity.
Body Image. 2009 Mar;6(2):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
2
Body image assessment for obesity (BIA-O): development of a new procedure.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Oct;24(10):1326-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801363.
4
Body shape questionnaire: psychometric properties of the short version (BSQ-8C) and norms from the general Swedish population.
Body Image. 2012 Sep;9(4):547-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
5
The reliability and validity of a group-administered version of the body image assessment.
Assessment. 2001 Mar;8(1):37-46. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800104.
7
Psychometric properties of worry and anxiety measures in a sample of african american and caucasian older adults.
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Feb;24(2):315-321. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1544217. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Validity and test-retest reliability in assessing current body size with figure drawings in Chinese adolescents.
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e107-13. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2011.575146. Epub 2011 May 24.

引用本文的文献

3
A comparison of men's and women's perceptions of the female body using a multidimensional scaling analysis of naturalistic stimuli.
Health Psychol Open. 2019 Jun 5;6(1):2055102919854665. doi: 10.1177/2055102919854665. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
5
Development and Validation of the Body Size Scale for Assessing Body Weight Perception in African Populations.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0138983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138983. eCollection 2015.
7
Body image changes associated with participation in an intensive lifestyle weight loss intervention.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Jun;19(6):1290-5. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.276. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Measurement of body image satisfaction using computer manipulation of a digital image.
J Psychol. 2004 Jul;138(4):325-37. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.138.4.325-338.
4
A computer-based method for the assessment of body-image distortions in anorexia-nervosa patients.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2001 Dec;5(4):311-9. doi: 10.1109/4233.966106.
6
Body image assessment for obesity (BIA-O): development of a new procedure.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Oct;24(10):1326-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801363.
7
Methodological concerns when using silhouettes to measure body image.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Apr;86(2):387-95. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.387.
8
Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: too coarse for comfort.
J Appl Psychol. 1992 Jun;77(3):336-42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.336.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验