Menvielle Gwenn, Boshuizen Hendriek, Kunst Anton E, Dalton Susanne O, Vineis Paolo, Bergmann Manuela M, Hermann Silke, Ferrari Pietro, Raaschou-Nielsen Ole, Tjønneland Anne, Kaaks Rudolf, Linseisen Jakob, Kosti Maria, Trichopoulou Antonia, Dilis Vardis, Palli Domenico, Krogh Vittorio, Panico Salvatore, Tumino Rosario, Büchner Frederike L, van Gils Carla H, Peeters Petra H M, Braaten Tonje, Gram Inger T, Lund Eiliv, Rodriguez Laudina, Agudo Antonio, Sánchez Maria-José, Tormo Maria-José, Ardanaz Eva, Manjer Jonas, Wirfält Elisabet, Hallmans Göran, Rasmuson Torgny, Bingham Sheila, Khaw Kay-Tee, Allen Naomi, Key Tim, Boffetta Paolo, Duell Eric J, Slimani Nadia, Gallo Valentina, Riboli Elio, Bueno-de-Mesquita H Bas
The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 4;101(5):321-30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn513. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
Studies in many countries have reported higher lung cancer incidence and mortality in individuals with lower socioeconomic status.
To investigate the role of smoking in these inequalities, we used data from 391,251 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, a cohort of individuals in 10 European countries. We collected information on smoking (history and quantity), fruit and vegetable consumption, and education through questionnaires at study entry and gathered data on lung cancer incidence for a mean of 8.4 years. Socioeconomic status was defined as the highest attained level of education, and participants were grouped by sex and region of residence (Northern Europe, Germany, or Southern Europe). Relative indices of inequality (RIIs) of lung cancer risk unadjusted and adjusted for smoking were estimated using Cox regression models. Additional analyses were performed by histological type.
During the study period, 939 men and 692 women developed lung cancer. Inequalities in lung cancer risk (RII(men) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.77 to 4.73, 117 vs 52 per 100,000 person-years for lowest vs highest education level; RII(women) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.77 to 3.21, 46 vs 25 per 100,000 person-years) decreased after adjustment for smoking but remained statistically significant (RII(men) = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.75 to 3.01; RII(women) = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.13). Large RIIs were observed among men and women in Northern European countries and among men in Germany, but inequalities in lung cancer risk were reverse (RIIs < 1) among women in Southern European countries. Inequalities differed by histological type. Adjustment for smoking reduced inequalities similarly for all histological types and among men and women in all regions. In all analysis, further adjustment for fruit and vegetable consumption did not change the estimates.
Self-reported smoking consistently explains approximately 50% of the inequalities in lung cancer risk due to differences in education.
许多国家的研究报告称,社会经济地位较低的个体肺癌发病率和死亡率较高。
为了调查吸烟在这些不平等现象中的作用,我们使用了欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查研究中391251名参与者的数据,该队列包括10个欧洲国家的个体。我们在研究开始时通过问卷调查收集了吸烟情况(吸烟史和吸烟量)、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及教育程度的信息,并收集了平均8.4年的肺癌发病率数据。社会经济地位被定义为所达到的最高教育水平,参与者按性别和居住地区(北欧、德国或南欧)分组。使用Cox回归模型估计未调整和调整吸烟因素后的肺癌风险不平等相对指数(RIIs)。按组织学类型进行了额外分析。
在研究期间,939名男性和692名女性患肺癌。肺癌风险不平等(男性RII = 3.62,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.77至4.73,最低与最高教育水平每10万人年分别为117例与52例;女性RII = 2.39,95%CI = 1.77至3.21,每10万人年分别为46例与25例)在调整吸烟因素后有所降低,但仍具有统计学意义(男性RII = 2.29,95%CI = 1.75至3.01;女性RII = 1.59,95%CI = 1.18至2.13)。在北欧国家的男性和女性以及德国的男性中观察到较大的RIIs,但在南欧国家的女性中肺癌风险不平等则相反(RIIs < 1)。不平等因组织学类型而异。调整吸烟因素后,所有组织学类型以及所有地区的男性和女性的不平等程度均有类似降低。在所有分析中,进一步调整水果和蔬菜摄入量并未改变估计值。
自我报告的吸烟情况一致地解释了因教育程度差异导致的肺癌风险不平等的约50%。