传统诊断命名法与多模态评估
Conventional diagnostic nomenclature versus multimodal assessment.
作者信息
Lazarus C N
机构信息
Princeton Biomedical Research, New Jersey 08540.
出版信息
Psychol Rep. 1991 Jun;68(3 Pt 2):1363-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1363.
PMID:1924634
Abstract
Standard psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., DSM-III-R) are compared with multimodal assessment and problem identification (i.e., BASIC I.D. formulations. Two case comparisons are presented as an heuristic to illustrate the way in which the multimodal framework promotes diagnostic precision and enhances clinical decision-making.
摘要
将标准的精神科诊断（如《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本）与多模式评估及问题识别（即基本个人数据结构[BASIC I.D.] 构想）进行比较。现呈现两个病例对照作为一种启发方式，以说明多模式框架提高诊断准确性并增强临床决策的方式。
Zotero 插件