Suppr超能文献

混淆诊断系统:基于标准的手册使用中的一个主要风险。

Confounding diagnostic systems: a major risk in the use of criteria-based manuals.

作者信息

Arolt V, Dilling H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Lübeck Medical School, FRG.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 1994;27(1-2):58-63. doi: 10.1159/000284849.

Abstract

In psychiatry, the new classification of diseases, the ICD-10/chapter V(F), will be introduced worldwide in the near future. As in the USA in the case of the DSM-III, psychiatrists will have to change their diagnostic procedures from traditional typology to criteria orientation. 83 West German psychiatrists in practice, who were unfamiliar with the use of criteria-oriented diagnostic systems, documented not only the ICD-9 diagnoses of 10,902 depressive patients but also their DSM-III diagnoses. A comparison between the results of the diagnostic distribution of this sample and a smaller sample diagnosed by well-trained interviewers reveals that, to a great extent, systematic mistakes were made, especially by confounding typological and criteria-oriented diagnostic entities. In a vulnerable period of changing diagnostic procedures, such as during the introduction of ICD-10, facilities for training and discussion should be supplied.

摘要

在精神病学领域,新的疾病分类法,即国际疾病分类第10版/第五章(F),将在不久的将来在全球范围内推行。就像美国采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版时一样,精神科医生将不得不把他们的诊断程序从传统的类型学方法转变为以标准为导向的方法。83位西德执业精神科医生,他们此前不熟悉使用以标准为导向的诊断系统,他们不仅记录了10902名抑郁症患者的国际疾病分类第9版诊断结果,还记录了这些患者的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版诊断结果。将这个样本的诊断分布结果与由训练有素的访谈者诊断的一个较小样本的结果进行比较后发现,在很大程度上出现了系统性错误,尤其是混淆了类型学和以标准为导向的诊断实体。在诊断程序变革的敏感时期,比如在引入国际疾病分类第10版期间,应该提供培训和讨论的便利条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验