Singh Kuldev, Shrivastava Anurag
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Glaucoma Service, Palo Alto, California 94305, USA.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;20(2):84-7. doi: 10.1097/icu.0b013e328324e6c4.
To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression.
There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOP' as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions.
A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.
回顾当前关于眼压波动/变化作为青光眼进展独立危险因素的重要性的文献。
文献中对于“眼压波动”和“平均眼压”作为青光眼进展危险因素的相对重要性存在相互矛盾的报道。越来越多的研究倾向于得出眼压波动是这种进展的重要独立危险因素的结论,但此类研究的质量存在很大差异。特别是,关于因果关系的假设对一些结论产生了质疑。近期研究还表明,我们不应摒弃平均眼压作为青光眼进展的重要预测指标。应当注意的是,关于该主题的多项分析来自主要为回答其他问题而设计的大型前瞻性随机临床试验。
对文献的回顾表明,尚无确凿证据证明眼压波动/变化是青光眼进展的独立危险因素。不应忽视平均眼压作为这种进展预测指标的重要性。限制所有关于该问题分析的一个主要因素是无法连续测量眼压,从而无法最佳地评估平均值和变异性。