Eng Michael K, Bernstein Andrew J, Katz Mark H, Shikanov Sergey, Zorn Kevin C, Shalhav Arieh L
Section of Urology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):439-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0223.
The size of renal lesions managed with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has been increasing, especially as surgical volume and experience matures. The objective of this study was to assess the perioperative and pathologic outcomes of LPN when stratifying for size of renal lesion.
A retrospective review of LPN performed at the University of Chicago by a single surgeon (ALS) between October 2002 to July 2007 was performed. Patients (153) were then stratified into three groups according to radiographic diameter of the lesion: < or = 2 cm (group A), 2 to 4 cm (group B), and > or = 4 cm (group C). Perioperative, operative, and pathologic data were compared using analysis of variance and Pearson test. Moreover, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) were assessed postoperatively.
With regard to operative parameters, operative time was significantly longer in renal lesions > 2 cm (P = 0.0012), and the need for collecting system repair was also more prevalent as lesion size increased (P < 0.0001). Warm ischemia time was longest with lesions 2 to 4 cm (35.3 min) compared with masses < or = 2 cm (27.2 min; P < 0.001) or > or = 4 cm (30.3 min; P = 0.028). All other variables were similar among the three groups, including the rates of positive surgical margins, complications, estimated blood loss, conversion, and transfusion. Comparison of pathologic data suggests smaller lesions are more likely to be of lower grade compared with larger lesions. Postoperative renal function did not differ among the groups with a mean follow-up of 19.9 months.
Although LPN for renal masses 2 to 4 cm necessitated longer warm ischemia, short-term postoperative renal function was not affected by lesion size. Differences in warm ischemia time cannot be attributed solely to lesion size but are likely influenced by a combination of tumor size, location, and depth. LPN can be performed safely in selected patients with larger renal lesions.
采用腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)治疗的肾病变大小一直在增加,尤其是随着手术量和经验的成熟。本研究的目的是在根据肾病变大小进行分层时,评估LPN的围手术期和病理结果。
对2002年10月至2007年7月期间由单一外科医生(ALS)在芝加哥大学进行的LPN手术进行回顾性研究。然后根据病变的影像学直径将153例患者分为三组:≤2 cm(A组)、2至4 cm(B组)和≥4 cm(C组)。使用方差分析和Pearson检验比较围手术期、手术和病理数据。此外,术后评估血清肌酐和肌酐清除率(Cockcroft-Gault公式)。
关于手术参数,病变>2 cm的手术时间明显更长(P = 0.0012),并且随着病变大小增加,集合系统修复的需求也更普遍(P < 0.0001)。与≤2 cm的肿块(27.2分钟;P < 0.001)或≥于4 cm的肿块(30.3分钟;P = 0.028)相比, 2至4 cm的病变热缺血时间最长(35.3分钟)。三组中的所有其他变量相似,包括手术切缘阳性率、并发症、估计失血量、中转率和输血率。病理数据比较表明,与较大病变相比,较小病变更可能为低级别。平均随访19.9个月时,各组术后肾功能无差异。
虽然对2至4 cm的肾肿块进行LPN需要更长的热缺血时间,但术后短期肾功能不受病变大小影响。热缺血时间的差异不能仅归因于病变大小,而可能受肿瘤大小、位置和深度的综合影响。LPN可以在选定的较大肾病变患者中安全进行。