• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肿瘤>4cm 与肿瘤<4cm 的比较:围手术期结果。

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Labbafinejad Hospital, Urology and Nephrology Research Centre, 9th Bousan St., Pasdaran Ave., P.O. Box 16666-94516, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Jun;43(2):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9812-x. Epub 2010 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-010-9812-x
PMID:20680449
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The use of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in patients with tumours >4 cm remains to be further evaluated. We report our experience with LPN in tumours >4 cm compared with tumours ≤4 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of data from all LPN patients operated from 2003 to 2008. Inclusion criteria were a single organ confined contrast enhancing mass/Bosniac III-IV cyst. Hospital admission records were used to extract operative and follow-up data. Patients were grouped into group A: ≤4 cm (32 patients, 53% of total), and group B: >4 cm (28 patients, 47% of total).

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (mean ± SD age, 47.4 ± 13.4 years; M/F, 36/24) were included. Mean ± SD tumour size was 31.5 ± 7.3 mm and 51.6 ± 10.9 mm in groups A and B, respectively. (P < 0.001) Malignant pathology was present in 22 (69%) and 16 patients (57%) in groups A and B, respectively. (P > 0.05) There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, pre-operative creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and other investigated pre-operative characteristics between study groups. (all P > 0.05) Nor any difference was observed regarding operative and pathologic (warm ischaemia time, operation duration, transfusion, positive margins, and malignant histology) as well as post-operative variables (re-hospitalization, post-operative complications, hospital stay, or eGFR changes).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study supports the feasibility and comparability of operative and post-operative early complications for LPN when applied to tumours >4 cm in selected patients compared with tumours ≤4 cm.

摘要

目的

在肿瘤>4cm 的患者中,腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)的应用仍需进一步评估。我们报告了与肿瘤≤4cm 相比,LPN 治疗>4cm 肿瘤的经验。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2003 年至 2008 年期间所有接受 LPN 治疗的患者的数据。纳入标准为单个器官局限性强化肿块/ Bosniac III-IV 囊肿。从住院记录中提取手术和随访数据。患者被分为 A 组:≤4cm(32 例,占总数的 53%)和 B 组:>4cm(28 例,占总数的 47%)。

结果

共纳入 60 例患者(平均年龄±标准差,47.4±13.4 岁;男/女,36/24)。A 组和 B 组的肿瘤平均大小分别为 31.5±7.3mm 和 51.6±10.9mm(P<0.001)。A 组和 B 组中分别有 22 例(69%)和 16 例(57%)患者存在恶性病理。(P>0.05)两组间年龄、性别、术前肌酐、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和其他术前特征无统计学差异(均 P>0.05)。手术和病理(热缺血时间、手术时间、输血、阳性切缘和恶性组织学)以及术后变量(再次住院、术后并发症、住院时间或 eGFR 变化)也无差异。

结论

本研究结果支持在选择的患者中,与肿瘤≤4cm 相比,LPN 应用于>4cm 肿瘤在手术和术后早期并发症方面的可行性和可比性。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results.腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肿瘤>4cm 与肿瘤<4cm 的比较:围手术期结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Jun;43(2):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9812-x. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
2
Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures.高手术复杂性肾肿瘤行腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)的围手术期及肾功能结局:无阻断与有阻断手术的单机构比较
World J Urol. 2017 Mar;35(3):403-409. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1882-7. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾门肿瘤:围手术期特征及短期功能和肿瘤学结局比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183-1187. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.连续患者中行腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:康奈尔大学的经验
BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):811-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05718.x.
5
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumours with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: peri-operative and oncological outcomes.RENAL肾计量评分≥7的复杂肾肿瘤患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):126-30. doi: 10.1111/bju.13214. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
7
A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study.机器人辅助或单纯腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中大型复杂肾肿瘤的前瞻性比较:来自法国多中心合作研究的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):256-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11528.x. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
8
Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm.腹腔镜下大于 4cm 肿瘤肾部分切除术的围手术期疗效。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.039. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
9
Laparoscopic vs robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours of >4 cm: a propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗>4cm 肾肿瘤:基于倾向评分的分析。
BJU Int. 2018 Sep;122(3):449-455. doi: 10.1111/bju.14386. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
10
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.部分腹腔镜肾切除术与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:T2 期肾癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):950-954. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0199. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive preoperative factors for renal insufficiency in patients followed for more than 5 years after radical nephrectomy.根治性肾切除术后随访超过5年的患者肾功能不全的术前预测因素。
Korean J Urol. 2013 May;54(5):303-10. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.5.303. Epub 2013 May 14.
2
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current status, techniques, and future directions.机器人辅助部分肾切除术:现状、技术和未来方向。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Feb;44(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9900-6. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm: a comparative study.腹腔镜下对大于4厘米肿瘤行部分肾切除术:一项对比研究。
J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0348.
2
Bolsterless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a simplification of the technique.无支撑腹腔镜部分肾切除术:技术简化
J Endourol. 2009 Jun;23(6):965-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0589.
3
Impact of renal lesion size on perioperative and pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.肾病变大小对接受腹腔镜肾部分切除术患者围手术期及病理结果的影响。
J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):439-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0223.
4
Elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors >4 cm.对肿瘤直径>4厘米的患者进行择期腹腔镜下部分肾切除术。
Urology. 2008 Sep;72(3):580-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.027. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
5
Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm.对直径大于4厘米的肾细胞癌进行选择性保留肾单位手术。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):71-4; discussion 74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.165. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.1800例腹腔镜与开放部分肾切除术治疗单一肾肿瘤的比较。
J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 May 11.
7
Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication.保留肾单位手术的发病率及临床结局与肿瘤大小和适应证的关系。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
8
5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.腹腔镜部分肾切除术的5年疗效
J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):70-4; discussion 74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.093.
9
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes.腹腔镜下部分肾切除术:当代技术与疗效
Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):660-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
10
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors.腹腔镜下肾门肿瘤部分切除术。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):850-3; discussion 853-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169493.05498.c3.