Wu I-Chen, Lee Chien-Hung, Kuo Chao-Hung, Kuo Fu-Chen, Wu Deng-Chyang, Ko Ying-Chin, Yu Fang-Jung
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Graduate Institutes of Medicine, College of Medicine, Center of Excellence for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2009 Feb;108(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60046-2.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The effect of betel quid chewing on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk has not been reported. In addition, there is no consensus about the causal relationship between smoking or alcohol consumption and CRC risk. This study investigated the impact of betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking or alcohol consumption on CRC risk in Taiwan.
Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with pathologically proven CRC (153 men, 105 women; mean age, 63.1 years) were recruited from two hospitals in southern Taiwan. The controls were 533 age- and gender-matched cancer-free subjects from the same hospitals. All subjects were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to collect demographic and substance use data.
After adjusting for potential confounding factors, smoking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), but not betel quid chewing (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.4) or alcohol drinking (aOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8), was an independent significant risk factor for developing CRC. The significant risk effect of smoking was seen mainly among men, because the frequency of smokers was much higher among Taiwanese men than women.
Our results indicated that consumption of cigarettes but not betel quid or alcohol was a risk factor for male CRC. A large study is necessary to investigate the risk factors for female CRC in Taiwan, and to understand the effect of betel quid exposure on male CRC.
背景/目的:嚼食槟榔对结直肠癌(CRC)风险的影响尚未见报道。此外,吸烟或饮酒与CRC风险之间的因果关系尚无定论。本研究调查了嚼食槟榔、吸烟或饮酒对台湾地区CRC风险的影响。
从台湾南部的两家医院招募了258例经病理证实的CRC患者(男性153例,女性105例;平均年龄63.1岁)。对照组为来自同两家医院的533例年龄和性别匹配的无癌受试者。所有受试者均通过标准化问卷进行访谈,以收集人口统计学和物质使用数据。
在调整潜在混杂因素后,吸烟(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.65;95%置信区间[CI],1.1 - 2.3)是发生CRC的独立显著危险因素,而嚼食槟榔(aOR,1.3;95% CI,0.7 - 2.4)或饮酒(aOR,1.1;95% CI,0.7 - 1.8)不是。吸烟的显著风险效应主要见于男性,因为台湾男性吸烟者的频率远高于女性。
我们的结果表明,吸烟而非嚼食槟榔或饮酒是男性CRC的危险因素。有必要进行大规模研究以调查台湾女性CRC的危险因素,并了解槟榔暴露对男性CRC的影响。