DiStefano Lindsay J, Padua Darin A, DiStefano Michael J, Marshall Stephen W
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):495-505. doi: 10.1177/0363546508327542.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention programs show promising results with changing movement; however, little information exists regarding whether a program designed for an individual's movements may be effective or how baseline movements may affect outcomes.
A program designed to change specific movements would be more effective than a "one-size-fits-all" program. Greatest improvement would be observed among individuals with the most baseline error. Subjects of different ages and sexes respond similarly.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
One hundred seventy-three youth soccer players from 27 teams were randomly assigned to a generalized or stratified program. Subjects were videotaped during jump-landing trials before and after the program and were assessed using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), which is a valid clinical movement analysis tool. A high LESS score indicates more errors. Generalized players performed the same exercises, while the stratified players performed exercises to correct their initial movement errors. Change scores were compared between groups of varying baseline errors, ages, sexes, and programs.
Subjects with the highest baseline LESS score improved the most (95% CI, -3.4 to -2.0). High school subjects (95% CI, -1.7 to -0.98) improved their technique more than pre-high school subjects (95% CI, -1.0 to -0.4). There was no difference between the programs or sexes.
Players with the greatest amount of movement errors experienced the most improvement. A program's effectiveness may be enhanced if this population is targeted.
前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤预防计划在改变运动方式方面显示出了有前景的结果;然而,关于针对个人运动设计的计划是否有效,或者基线运动如何影响结果,几乎没有相关信息。
设计用于改变特定运动的计划比“一刀切”的计划更有效。在基线误差最大的个体中观察到的改善最大。不同年龄和性别的受试者反应相似。
随机对照试验;证据级别,1级。
来自27支球队的173名青少年足球运动员被随机分配到通用计划或分层计划。在计划前后的跳跃着陆试验中对受试者进行录像,并使用着陆误差评分系统(LESS)进行评估,该系统是一种有效的临床运动分析工具。LESS得分高表明错误更多。通用组的运动员进行相同的练习,而分层组的运动员进行练习以纠正他们最初的运动错误。比较不同基线误差、年龄、性别和计划组之间的变化分数。
基线LESS得分最高的受试者改善最大(95%可信区间,-3.4至-2.0)。高中受试者(95%可信区间,-1.7至-0.98)比高中前受试者(95%可信区间,-1.0至-0.4)在技术上有更大改善。计划或性别之间没有差异。
运动错误最多的运动员改善最大。如果针对这一人群,计划的有效性可能会提高。