Coppieters Michel W, Hough Alan D, Dilley Andrew
Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Mar;39(3):164-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2913.
Controlled laboratory study using single-group, within-subject comparisons.
To determine in an in vivo study whether different types of nerve-gliding exercises are associated with different amounts of longitudinal nerve excursion.
Different types of nerve-gliding exercises have been proposed. It is assumed that different exercises produce different amounts of excursion and strain in the peripheral nervous system. Although this has been confirmed in cadaveric experiments, in vivo studies are lacking.
High-resolution ultrasound was used to measure longitudinal excursion of the median nerve in the upper arm during 6 different nerve-gliding exercises. Nerve mobilization techniques that involved the elbow and neck were evaluated in 15 asymptomatic volunteers (mean +/- SD age, 30 +/- 8 years). Nerve longitudinal excursion was calculated using a frame-by-frame cross-correlation analysis. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the data.
Different exercises induced different amounts of longitudinal nerve excursion (P<.0001). The "sliding technique" was associated with the largest excursion (mean +/- SD, 10.2 +/- 2.8 mm; P = .0001). The amount of nerve movement associated with the "tensioning technique" (mean +/- SD, 1.8 +/- 4.0 mm) was smaller than the nerve excursion induced with individual movements of the neck or elbow (mean +/- SD range, -3.4 +/- 0.9 to 5.6 +/- 2.1 mm; P = .0001).
These findings confirm that different types of neurodynamic techniques have different mechanical effects on the nervous system. Recognition of these differences may assist in the selection of treatment techniques. Having demonstrated differences in mechanical effects, future research will have to evaluate whether these different techniques are also associated with different physiological and therapeutic effects.
采用单组受试者自身对照的对照实验室研究。
在一项体内研究中确定不同类型的神经滑动练习是否与不同程度的神经纵向移动相关。
已提出不同类型的神经滑动练习。据推测,不同的练习在外周神经系统中产生不同程度的移动和应变。尽管这在尸体实验中已得到证实,但缺乏体内研究。
使用高分辨率超声测量15名无症状志愿者(平均年龄±标准差,30±8岁)在6种不同神经滑动练习过程中上臂正中神经的纵向移动。对涉及肘部和颈部的神经松动技术进行评估。使用逐帧互相关分析计算神经纵向移动。采用重复测量方差分析来分析数据。
不同的练习引起不同程度的神经纵向移动(P<0.0001)。“滑动技术”与最大移动相关(平均±标准差,10.2±2.8毫米;P = 0.0001)。与“张紧技术”相关的神经移动量(平均±标准差,1.8±4.0毫米)小于颈部或肘部单独移动引起的神经移动(平均±标准差范围,-3.4±0.9至5.6±2.1毫米;P = 0.0001)。
这些发现证实不同类型的神经动力技术对神经系统有不同的力学效应。认识到这些差异可能有助于治疗技术的选择。在证明了力学效应的差异之后,未来的研究将必须评估这些不同的技术是否也与不同的生理和治疗效果相关。