Santarcangelo Enrica Laura, Scattina E, Carli G, Balocchi R, Macerata A, Manzoni D
Department of Human Physiology, University of Pisa, Via San Zeno, 31, 56127, Pisa, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Apr;194(2):323-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1740-6. Epub 2009 Mar 1.
Aim of the experiment was to study whether cognitive load affects postural control more in low (Lows) than in highly hypnotizable (Highs) subjects due to the latter's greater attentional abilities. Standing Highs and Lows underwent an experimental session (closed eyes) consisting of a basal condition and of mental computation in an easy (stable support) and a difficult (unstable support) postural condition. Variability [standard deviation (SD)] and complexity [sample entropy (SampEn)] of the movement of the centre of pressure (CoP), its mean velocity (Velocity), the area swept by the CoP (Area) and the ratio between the CoP trajectory length and area [length for surface (LFS)] were measured. Few hypnotizability-related differences were detected (reduction in the Highs' SD and increases in the Lows' LFS in the difficult postural condition). Thus, the hypnotizability-related postural differences observed in previous studies during sensory alteration could not be accounted mainly by attentional abilities.
该实验的目的是研究由于高度可催眠者(Highs)具有更强的注意力,认知负荷对低可催眠者(Lows)姿势控制的影响是否比高度可催眠者更大。让站立的Highs和Lows进行一个实验环节(闭眼),该环节包括基础状态以及在容易(稳定支撑)和困难(不稳定支撑)姿势条件下的心理计算。测量了压力中心(CoP)运动的变异性[标准差(SD)]和复杂性[样本熵(SampEn)]、其平均速度(Velocity)、CoP扫过的面积(Area)以及CoP轨迹长度与面积的比值[表面长度(LFS)]。检测到很少与可催眠性相关的差异(在困难姿势条件下,Highs的SD降低,Lows的LFS增加)。因此,先前研究中在感觉改变期间观察到的与可催眠性相关的姿势差异不能主要由注意力来解释。