Rijal A, Little B, McPhee S, Meddings R N
Department of Urology, Ayr Hospital, Dalmillington Road, KA6 6DX, UK.
Nepal Med Coll J. 2008 Sep;10(3):155-9.
The study was conducted to find out if intermittent self dilatation (ISD) is still a viable option for treatment of urethral strictures in patients who had undergone either urethral dilatation or urethrotomy prior to ISD. The study included 310 male patients with the age range from 17 to 93 years old from January 1996 to March 2007. The data was gathered from the computer data base kept by the urology unit in the hospital. A questionnaire was used to evaluate their tolerance towards the procedure and quality of life. Of the total number of patients 262 replied to the questionnaire. The mean follow up was 57.68 months with 67.7% continuing with the procedure. The procedure was well tolerated by 84.1% of patients and 79.6% had no technical difficulty. The most number of patients carrying out this procedure were in the 6th and 7th decade of life. There was a recurrence rate of urethral strictures of 16.9%. It is seen that even today ISD following an endoscopic procedure is a viable treatment option. The patients seem to tolerate this procedure well and it is an option in the elderly patient group who may not be fit or willing to undergo reconstructive surgery or urethroplasty.
本研究旨在确定间歇性自我扩张(ISD)对于在进行ISD之前已接受尿道扩张或尿道切开术的患者治疗尿道狭窄是否仍是一种可行的选择。该研究纳入了1996年1月至2007年3月期间年龄在17至93岁之间的310名男性患者。数据来自医院泌尿外科保存的计算机数据库。使用问卷调查来评估他们对该手术的耐受性和生活质量。在所有患者中,262人回复了问卷。平均随访时间为57.68个月,67.7%的患者继续接受该手术。84.1%的患者对该手术耐受性良好,79.6%的患者没有技术困难。进行该手术的患者最多的年龄段为60多岁和70多岁。尿道狭窄的复发率为16.9%。可以看出,即使在今天,内镜手术后的ISD仍是一种可行的治疗选择。患者似乎对该手术耐受性良好,对于那些可能不适合或不愿意接受重建手术或尿道成形术的老年患者群体来说,这是一种选择。