Harris Michelle A, Peck Ronald F, Colton Shannon, Morris Jennifer, Chaibub Neto Elias, Kallio Julie
Biology Core Curriculum, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1794, USA.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2009 Spring;8(1):29-43. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-07-0039.
We conducted a controlled investigation to examine whether a combination of computer imagery and tactile tools helps introductory cell biology laboratory undergraduate students better learn about protein structure/function relationships as compared with computer imagery alone. In all five laboratory sections, students used the molecular imaging program, Protein Explorer (PE). In the three experimental sections, three-dimensional physical models were made available to the students, in addition to PE. Student learning was assessed via oral and written research summaries and videotaped interviews. Differences between the experimental and control group students were not found in our typical course assessments such as research papers, but rather were revealed during one-on-one interviews with students at the end of the semester. A subset of students in the experimental group produced superior answers to some higher-order interview questions as compared with students in the control group. During the interview, students in both groups preferred to use either the hand-held models alone or in combination with the PE imaging program. Students typically did not use any tools when answering knowledge (lower-level thinking) questions, but when challenged with higher-level thinking questions, students in both the control and experimental groups elected to use the models.
我们进行了一项对照研究,以检验与仅使用计算机图像相比,计算机图像与触觉工具相结合是否能帮助细胞生物学入门课程的本科学生更好地了解蛋白质结构/功能关系。在所有五个实验小组中,学生们都使用了分子成像程序“蛋白质探索者”(PE)。在三个实验组中,除了PE之外,还为学生提供了三维实体模型。通过口头和书面研究总结以及录像访谈来评估学生的学习情况。在诸如研究论文等我们常规的课程评估中,未发现实验组和对照组学生之间存在差异,而是在学期末对学生进行的一对一访谈中发现了差异。与对照组学生相比,实验组中的一部分学生对一些高阶访谈问题给出了更出色的答案。在访谈中,两组学生都更倾向于单独使用手持模型或与PE成像程序结合使用。学生在回答知识(低层次思维)问题时通常不使用任何工具,但当面对高层次思维问题时,对照组和实验组的学生都选择使用模型。