Rosen Leora N, Dragiewicz Molly, Gibbs Jennifer C
University of Southern California, Office of Research Advancement, Washington, DC, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2009 May;15(5):513-31. doi: 10.1177/1077801209331409. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
This article combines information from fathers' rights Web sites with demographic, historical, and other information to provide an empirically based analysis of fathers' rights advocacy in the United States. Content analysis discerns three factors that are central to the groups' rhetoric: representing domestic violence allegations as false, promoting presumptive joint custody and decreasing child support, and portraying women as perpetrators of domestic abuse. Fathers' rights organizations and themes are examined in relation to state-level demographics and custody policy. The implications of fathers' rights activism for battered women and their children are explored.
本文将来自父亲权利网站的信息与人口统计学、历史及其他信息相结合,以对美国父亲权利倡导进行基于实证的分析。内容分析识别出该群体言辞中的三个核心因素:将家庭暴力指控视为虚假、推动推定共同监护并减少子女抚养费,以及将女性描绘为家庭虐待的实施者。文章结合州层面的人口统计学和监护政策,对父亲权利组织及其主题进行了审视。同时探讨了父亲权利激进主义对受虐妇女及其子女的影响。