School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Jul-Aug;16(4):15579883221115594. doi: 10.1177/15579883221115594.
Nonresident fathers, following separation/divorce, are more likely to experience multiple forms of family types simultaneously than any other sociodemographic group. Although there is considerable writing on the factors and issues surrounding nonresident fathers from academics, the Family court, the Child Support Agency, and women's and welfare groups, the voice of nonresident fathers themselves is rarely heard. This is due to nonresident fathers being marginalized, disempowered, and silenced by these same entities. The voice of nonresident fathers is routinely minimized, dismissed, and labeled as anti-feminist or a backlash to feminism. This opinion piece argues that there is a need for qualitative research to be undertaken to investigate, document, and explore nonresident fathers' voices from their own perspective to hear what they have to say of themselves so that a better understanding of the dynamics that impact and influence them can be achieved. This would mean that actions can be identified and undertaken to better understand nonresident fathers' situation while providing insights for the development of social policies by Government and Welfare agencies together with support care for nonresident fathers highlighting their desires and needs.
与其他任何社会人口群体相比,离婚/分居后的非婚生父亲更有可能同时经历多种形式的家庭类型。尽管学术界、家庭法庭、儿童抚养机构以及妇女和福利团体就非婚生父亲的相关因素和问题进行了大量的研究,但非婚生父亲自己的声音却很少被听到。这是因为非婚生父亲被这些相同的实体边缘化、被剥夺权力和噤声。非婚生父亲的声音通常被最小化、被忽视,并被贴上反女权主义或女权主义反弹的标签。这篇观点文章认为,有必要进行定性研究,从他们自己的角度调查、记录和探索非婚生父亲的声音,听取他们的意见,以便更好地了解影响和影响他们的动态。这意味着可以采取行动,更好地了解非婚生父亲的处境,同时为政府和福利机构制定社会政策提供见解,并为非婚生父亲提供支持和关怀,突出他们的愿望和需求。