Pickett-Heaps Jeremy, Forer Art
School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Protoplasma. 2009 Mar;235(1-4):91-9. doi: 10.1007/s00709-009-0030-2. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
Current spindle models explain "anaphase A" (movement of chromosomes to the poles) in terms of a motility system based solely on microtubules (MTs) and that functions in a manner unique to mitosis. We find both these propositions unlikely. An evolutionary perspective suggests that when the spindle evolved, it should have come to share not only components (e.g., microtubules) of the interphase cell but also the primitive motility systems available, including those using actin and myosin. Other systems also came to be involved in the additional types of motility that now accompany mitosis in extant spindles. The resultant functional redundancy built reliability into this critical and complex process. Such multiple mechanisms are also confusing to those who seek to understand how chromosomes move. Narrowing this commentary down to just anaphase A, we argue that the spindle matrix participates with MTs in anaphase A and that this matrix may contain actin and myosin. The diatom spindle illustrates how such a system could function. This matrix may be motile and work in association with the MT cytoskeleton, as it does with the actin cytoskeleton during cell ruffling and amoeboid movement. Instead of pulling the chromosome polewards, the kinetochore fibre's role might be to slow polewards movement to allow correct chromosome attachment to the spindle. Perhaps the earliest eukaryotic cell was a cytoplast organised around a radial MT cytoskeleton. For cell division, it separated into two cytoplasts via a spindle of overlapping MTs. Cytokinesis was actin-based cleavage. As chromosomes evolved into individual entities, their interaction with the dividing cytoplast developed into attachment of the kinetochore to radial (cytoplast) MTs. We believe it most likely that cytoplasmic motility systems participated in these events.
当前的纺锤体模型依据一个仅基于微管(MTs)且以有丝分裂特有的方式发挥作用的运动系统来解释“后期A”(染色体向两极移动)。我们发现这两个观点都不太可能成立。从进化的角度来看,当纺锤体进化时,它不仅应该共享间期细胞的组成部分(如微管),还应共享可用的原始运动系统,包括那些使用肌动蛋白和肌球蛋白的系统。其他系统也参与到了现存纺锤体中有丝分裂伴随的其他类型的运动中。由此产生的功能冗余为这个关键且复杂的过程建立了可靠性。这种多种机制对于试图理解染色体如何移动的人来说也很令人困惑。将本评论缩小到仅关于后期A,我们认为纺锤体基质在后期A中与微管共同起作用,并且这种基质可能含有肌动蛋白和肌球蛋白。硅藻纺锤体说明了这样一个系统可能是如何发挥作用的。这种基质可能是可运动的,并与微管细胞骨架协同工作,就像它在细胞边缘波动和变形运动期间与肌动蛋白细胞骨架协同工作一样。动粒纤维的作用可能不是将染色体拉向两极,而是减缓向两极的移动,以允许染色体正确地附着到纺锤体上。也许最早的真核细胞是围绕放射状微管细胞骨架组织起来的细胞质体。为了进行细胞分裂,它通过重叠微管的纺锤体分成两个细胞质体。胞质分裂是以肌动蛋白为基础的分裂。随着染色体进化成单个实体,它们与分裂的细胞质体的相互作用发展成动粒与放射状(细胞质体)微管的附着。我们认为细胞质运动系统很可能参与了这些事件。