Berenholtz Sean M, Hartsell Theresa L, Pronovost Peter J
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. sberenh1@ jhmi.edu
Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):192-5. doi: 10.1177/1062860609332370. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
While required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and recommended by the Institute of Medicine, there are few published studies demonstrating that morbidity and mortality conferences (MMCs) are an effective strategy to improve patient care. To learn from medical incidents and improve patient care, care-givers need to: (1) elicit input from all staff involved in the incident, (2) use a structured framework to investigate all underlying contributing factors, and (3) assign responsibility for management and follow-up on recommendations. Many MMCs lack these key elements. The specific aims of this article are to describe the use of the learning from a defect tool as a strategy to meet ACGME requirements, advance medical education, and enhance traditional MMCs in one fellowship program at an academic medical institution. In addition, this approach improved patient care and provided a foundation for our fellows to use to address patient safety defects after fellowship.
虽然研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)有要求,医学研究所也有推荐,但很少有已发表的研究表明发病率和死亡率会议(MMCs)是改善患者护理的有效策略。为了从医疗事件中吸取教训并改善患者护理,护理人员需要:(1)征求参与该事件的所有工作人员的意见,(2)使用结构化框架调查所有潜在的促成因素,以及(3)明确管理责任并对建议进行跟进。许多MMCs缺乏这些关键要素。本文的具体目的是描述如何使用缺陷学习工具作为一种策略,以满足ACGME的要求,推进医学教育,并在一所学术医疗机构的一个 fellowship 项目中强化传统的MMCs。此外,这种方法改善了患者护理,并为我们的学员在 fellowship 结束后用于解决患者安全缺陷奠定了基础。