Aboumatar Hanan J, Blackledge Charles G, Dickson Conan, Heitmiller Eugenie, Freischlag Julie, Pronovost Peter J
Center for Innovations in Quality Patient Care, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287-0765, USA.
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):232-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860607303292.
The purpose of this article is to study morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models. Structured interviews with morbidity and mortality conference leaders of 12 (75%) clinical departments at Johns Hopkins Hospital were conducted. Reported morbidity and mortality conference goals included medical management (75%), teaching (58%), and patient safety and quality improvement (42%). Methods for case identification, selection, presentation, and analysis varied among departments. Morbidity and mortality conferences were attended mostly by physicians from the respective departments. One (8%) department had a standard approach for eliciting input from all providers on the case, another (8%) used a structured tool to explore underlying system factors, and 7 (58%) departments had a plan for assigning follow-up on recommendations. There is wide variation in how morbidity and mortality conferences are conducted across departments and little conformity to known models for analyzing medical incidents. Models for best practices in conducting morbidity and mortality conferences are needed.
本文旨在研究发病率与死亡率研讨会及其与医疗事件分析模型的契合度。对约翰霍普金斯医院12个(75%)临床科室的发病率与死亡率研讨会负责人进行了结构化访谈。报告的发病率与死亡率研讨会目标包括医疗管理(75%)、教学(58%)以及患者安全与质量改进(42%)。各科室在病例识别、选择、呈现和分析方法上存在差异。发病率与死亡率研讨会主要由各科室的医生参加。一个(8%)科室有从所有医疗服务提供者处获取病例相关意见的标准方法,另一个(8%)科室使用结构化工具来探究潜在的系统因素,7个(58%)科室有对建议进行跟进的计划。各科室开展发病率与死亡率研讨会的方式差异很大,与已知的医疗事件分析模型几乎没有契合度。需要制定开展发病率与死亡率研讨会的最佳实践模型。