Spertus John A, Jones Philip G, Masoudi Frederick A, Rumsfeld John S, Krumholz Harlan M
Mid America Heart Institute of Saint Luke's Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Mar 3;150(5):314-24. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00007.
Little information is available about factors associated with racial differences across a broad spectrum of post-myocardial infarction outcomes, including patients' symptoms and quality of life.
To determine racial differences in mortality, rehospitalization, angina, and quality of life after myocardial infarction and identify the factors associated with these differences.
Prospective cohort study.
10 hospitals in the United States.
1849 patients who had myocardial infarction, 28% of whom were black.
Demographic, economic, clinical, psychosocial, and treatment characteristics and outcomes were prospectively collected. Outcomes included time to 2-year all-cause mortality, 1-year rehospitalization, and Seattle Angina Questionnaire-assessed angina and quality of life.
Black patients had higher unadjusted mortality (19.9% vs. 9.3%; P < 0.001) and rehospitalization rates (45.4% vs. 40.4%; P = 0.130), more angina (28.0% vs. 17.8%; P < 0.001), and worse mean quality of life (80.6 [SD, 22.5] vs. 85.9 [SD, 17.2]; P < 0.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics, black patients trended toward greater mortality (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.81]; P = 0.142), fewer rehospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.82 [CI, 0.66 to 1.02]; P = 0.071), and higher likelihood of angina at 1 year (odds ratio, 1.41 [CI, 1.03 to 1.94]; P = 0.032) but similar quality of life (mean difference, -0.6 [CI, -3.4 to 2.2]). Adjustment for site of care further attenuated mortality differences (hazard ratio, 1.04 [CI, 0.71 to 1.52]; P = 0.84). Adjustment for treatments had minimal effect on any association.
Residual confounding and missing data may have introduced bias.
Although black patients with myocardial infarction have worse outcomes than white patients, these differences did not persist after adjustment for patient factors and site of care. Further adjustment for treatments received minimally influenced observed differences. Strategies that focus on improving baseline cardiac risk and hospital factors may do more than treatment-focused strategies to attenuate racial differences in myocardial infarction outcomes.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Specialized Center of Clinically Oriented Research in Cardiac Dysfunction and Disease, CV Therapeutics, and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
关于广泛的心肌梗死后结局(包括患者症状和生活质量)方面种族差异的相关因素,目前所知甚少。
确定心肌梗死后死亡率、再住院率、心绞痛及生活质量方面的种族差异,并识别与这些差异相关的因素。
前瞻性队列研究。
美国10家医院。
1849例心肌梗死患者,其中28%为黑人。
前瞻性收集人口统计学、经济、临床、心理社会及治疗特征和结局。结局包括2年全因死亡率、1年再住院率,以及采用西雅图心绞痛问卷评估的心绞痛和生活质量。
未经调整时,黑人患者死亡率更高(19.9%对9.3%;P<0.001)、再住院率更高(45.4%对40.4%;P=0.130)、心绞痛更多(28.0%对17.8%;P<0.001),平均生活质量更差(80.6[标准差,22.5]对85.9[标准差,17.2];P<0.001)。在对患者特征进行调整后,黑人患者死亡率有升高趋势(风险比,1.29[95%置信区间,0.92至1.81];P=0.142),再住院率更低(风险比,0.82[置信区间,0.66至1.02];P=0.071),1年时发生心绞痛的可能性更高(比值比,1.41[置信区间,1.03至1.94];P=0.032),但生活质量相似(平均差异,-0.6[置信区间,-3.4至2.2])。对治疗地点进行调整进一步减弱了死亡率差异(风险比,1.04[置信区间,0.71至1.52];P=0.84)。对治疗进行调整对任何关联的影响最小。
残余混杂和数据缺失可能导致偏倚。
虽然心肌梗死黑人患者的结局比白人患者差,但在对患者因素和治疗地点进行调整后,这些差异不再存在。对所接受治疗进行进一步调整对观察到的差异影响极小。关注改善基线心脏风险和医院因素的策略可能比专注于治疗的策略在减弱心肌梗死结局的种族差异方面更有效。
美国国立心肺血液研究所心脏功能障碍与疾病临床导向研究专业中心、CV治疗公司及心血管结局研究。