• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同止血装置对经桡动脉导管介入术后桡动脉结局的影响。

Impact of two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization.

作者信息

Pancholy Samir B

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Mercy Hospital and Community Medical Center, Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Mar;21(3):101-4.

PMID:19258639
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the effectof two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization.

BACKGROUND

Radial artery occlusion is an infrequent but discouraging complication of transradial access. It is related to factors such as sheath-to-artery ratio and its incidence is decreased by the administration of heparin. It usually does not lead to ischemic complications, but precludes future transradial access.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

500 consecutive patients undergoing transradial catheterization were prospectively enrolled in the study. 250 consecutive patients received hemostasis by application of the HemoBand (Group I), and the next 250 patients received hemostasis using the inflatable TR Band (Group II). Radial artery patency was studied at the time of application of the hemostasis device, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes and at 24 hours and 30 days using Barbeau's test.

RESULTS

28 patients in Group I (11.2%), developed early occlusion (at 24 hours), compared to 11 patients (4.4%) in Group II (p < 0.005). 18 patients in Group I (7.2%), developed evidence of chronic occlusion (at 30 days), compared to 8 patients (3.2%) in Group II (p < 0.05). Early (30 minutes) return of patency was seen more frequently in Group II using the TR Band compared to Group I using the HemoBand (75% vs. 24%; p < 0.001), probably related to a significant early (30 minutes) decrease in TR Band air-chamber pressure. No significant bleeding complication occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

A significant reduction in radial artery occlusion was noted with hemostasis using the TR Band compared to the HemoBand, without compromising hemostatic efficacy.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估两种不同止血装置对经桡动脉导管插入术后桡动脉结局的影响。

背景

桡动脉闭塞是经桡动脉穿刺的一种少见但令人沮丧的并发症。它与鞘管与动脉比例等因素有关,肝素的使用可降低其发生率。它通常不会导致缺血性并发症,但会妨碍未来的经桡动脉穿刺。

患者和方法

500例连续接受经桡动脉导管插入术的患者被前瞻性纳入本研究。250例连续患者通过应用HemoBand进行止血(第一组),接下来的250例患者使用可充气的TR Band进行止血(第二组)。在应用止血装置时、30分钟、60分钟、24小时和30天时,使用Barbeau试验研究桡动脉通畅情况。

结果

第一组有28例患者(11.2%)出现早期闭塞(24小时时),而第二组有11例患者(4.4%)出现早期闭塞(p<0.005)。第一组有18例患者(7.2%)出现慢性闭塞证据(30天时),而第二组有8例患者(3.2%)出现慢性闭塞证据(p<0.05)。与使用HemoBand的第一组相比,使用TR Band的第二组更频繁地出现早期(30分钟)通畅恢复(75%对24%;p<0.001),这可能与TR Band气室压力在早期(30分钟)显著降低有关。两组均未发生明显出血并发症。

结论

与HemoBand相比,使用TR Band止血时桡动脉闭塞显著减少,且不影响止血效果。

相似文献

1
Impact of two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization.两种不同止血装置对经桡动脉导管介入术后桡动脉结局的影响。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Mar;21(3):101-4.
2
Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.桡动脉闭塞预防-通畅止血评估试验(PROPHET研究):经桡动脉导管插入术后传统止血与记录通畅性止血的随机对照比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):335-340. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21639.
3
Comparison of a priori versus provisional heparin therapy on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent hemostasis (from the PHARAOH Study).经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和止血有效后桡动脉闭塞的肝素预先治疗与临时治疗的比较(来自 PHARAOH 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 15;110(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Comparison of the effect of intra-arterial versus intravenous heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.经桡动脉导管插入术后动脉内与静脉内肝素对桡动脉闭塞影响的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Oct 15;104(8):1083-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.057. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial access.经桡动脉入路止血压迫时间对桡动脉闭塞的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):78-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22963. Epub 2011 May 16.
6
Comparison of Hemostasis Times With a Kaolin-Based Hemostatic Pad (QuikClot Radial) vs Mechanical Compression (TR Band) Following Transradial Access: A Pilot Prospective Study.经桡动脉穿刺后使用高岭土基止血垫(QuikClot Radial)与机械压迫(TR Band)的止血时间比较:一项前瞻性试点研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Oct;29(10):328-334. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
7
Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP).基于平均动脉压引导的桡动脉压迫与使用气动装置的标准压迫(RACOMAP)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar 1;73(4):467-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21900.
8
A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后两种桡动脉止血装置的比较。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):192-6. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000115.
9
Usefulness of a Gentle and Short Hemostasis Using the Transradial Band Device after Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Interventions to Reduce the Radial Artery Occlusion Rate (from the Prospective and Randomized CRASOC I, II, and III Studies).经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影及介入治疗后,使用桡动脉束带装置进行轻柔短暂止血以降低桡动脉闭塞率的有效性(来自前瞻性随机CRASOC I、II和III研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;120(3):374-379. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
[Clinical trial of radial artery compression guided by mean arterial pressure].[平均动脉压引导下桡动脉压迫的临床试验]
Enferm Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;19(4):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Radial Artery Thrombosis and Associated Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Radial Coronary Angiography.接受桡动脉冠状动脉造影患者的桡动脉血栓形成及相关危险因素
Heart Int. 2024 Oct 21;18(2):37-43. doi: 10.17925/HI.2024.18.2.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of Safety of RADial comPRESSion Devices: A Multi-Center Trial of Patent Hemostasis following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Conventional Radial Access (RAD-PRESS Trial).桡动脉压迫装置安全性比较:一项经皮冠状动脉介入术后传统桡动脉入路专利止血的多中心试验(RAD-PRESS试验)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 1;13(1):143. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010143.
3
Frequency and Predictors of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者桡动脉闭塞的发生率及预测因素
Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25505. eCollection 2022 May.
4
The Design and Feasibility of the: Radial Artery Puncture Hemostasis Evaluation - RAPHE Study, a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.桡动脉穿刺止血评估(RAPHE)研究的设计与可行性:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床试验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 27;9:881266. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.881266. eCollection 2022.
5
A comparative study of TR Band and a new hemostatic compression device after transradial coronary catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉导管插入术后TR Band与一种新型止血压迫装置的对比研究。
J Interv Med. 2019 Apr 30;1(4):221-228. doi: 10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.04.05. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
A comparative study of Terumo radial Band® and PreludeSYNC hemostasis compression device after transradial coronary catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗后使用 Terumo 桡动脉 Band® 和 PreludeSYNC 止血压迫装置的对比研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;25(6):402-406. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.34694.
7
The frequency of radial artery occlusion following cardiac catheterization with the use of transradial pneumatic compression band.使用经桡动脉充气加压带进行心导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的发生率。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Oct 20;13(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05323-8.
8
What is the preferred hemostasis method for coronary angiography through the palmar artery access?经掌动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术时,首选的止血方法是什么?
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Oct;36(4):490-497. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00707-w. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
9
Access-site Complications of the Transradial Approach: Rare But Still There.经桡动脉入路的并发症:虽罕见但仍存在。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(3):279-293. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16999200819101923.
10
Nonfemoral Arterial Hemostasis Following Percutaneous Intervention Using a Focused Compression Device.经皮介入使用集中压迫装置后的非股动脉止血。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 May;43(5):714-720. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02431-7. Epub 2020 Feb 10.