University College London, Department of Mental Health Sciences, UK.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;24(8):865-74. doi: 10.1002/gps.2207.
Subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) has been proposed as a clinical stage which may precede mild cognitive impairment in the clinical continuum of AD, and is characterised by the presence of subjective memory complaints in the absence of objective cognitive deficits. Specific memory-related brain activation differences have been reported in mild cognitive impairment and in cognitively normal individuals at known genetic risk of AD; our objective was to determine whether similar differences are present in people with SCI.
We compared brain activation in a memory clinic sample of 10 SCI subjects and 10 controls during a verbal episodic memory encoding task using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
There were no differences between groups on measures of encoding success (recognition accuracy) nor was there evidence of altered semantic processing. Both groups activated left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and cerebellum during encoding. The SCI group also demonstrated activation in left medial temporal, occipitoparietal and medial frontal cortex. Group comparisons revealed increased activation in SCI in left PFC, where activation strength correlated with memory task performance.
The activation differences reported in this study may reflect the employment of compensatory strategies in the face of early AD pathology, although a number of alternative explanations need to be considered. Further studies with larger samples may help to determine whether the observed activation changes are likely to be associated with early neuropathological processes or with other unrelated factors.
主观认知障碍(SCI)被认为是 AD 临床连续体中轻度认知障碍之前的一个临床阶段,其特征是存在主观记忆主诉,而无客观认知缺陷。在轻度认知障碍和认知正常个体中,已经报道了与特定记忆相关的大脑激活差异,这些个体具有 AD 的已知遗传风险;我们的目的是确定在具有 SCI 的个体中是否存在类似的差异。
我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)比较了记忆诊所中 10 名 SCI 受试者和 10 名对照在言语情节记忆编码任务期间的大脑激活。
两组在编码成功(识别准确性)方面没有差异,也没有证据表明语义处理改变。两组在编码期间均激活左前额叶皮层(PFC)和小脑。SCI 组还在左内侧颞叶、顶枕叶和内侧额叶皮层显示出激活。组间比较显示 SCI 组在左 PFC 中激活增加,而激活强度与记忆任务表现相关。
本研究报告的激活差异可能反映了在面对早期 AD 病理时采用的补偿策略,尽管需要考虑许多其他替代解释。进一步的研究,包括更大的样本,可能有助于确定观察到的激活变化是否可能与早期神经病理学过程或其他无关因素有关。