Hobkirk John A, Abdel-Latif Hind H, Howlett Julie, Welfare Richard, Moles David R
Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, UCL Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University College, University of London, 256 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK.
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):13-9.
The aim of this study was to compare, prospectively, treatment with implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional complete dentures.
Part 2 of this paper reports on the outcome after 7 years of denture use, using additional questionnaires.
Patients with implant-stabilized overdentures continued to be more satisfied with their mandibular dentures and their diet than those using conventional complete dentures. About 50% of the implant group who completed the questionnaire had had their dentures remade. The other 50% remained satisfied with their original dentures and were still using them at the 7-year review. The average chairside time spent on them was 467 minutes.
Mandibular overdentures with two endosseous implants permit better function than conventional complete dentures.
本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿与传统全口义齿的治疗效果。
本文的第二部分使用额外的问卷报告了义齿使用7年后的结果。
与使用传统全口义齿的患者相比,种植体稳定覆盖义齿的患者对其下颌义齿和饮食的满意度更高。完成问卷的种植体组中约50%的患者重新制作了义齿。另外50%的患者对其原义齿仍感满意,并在7年复查时仍在使用。在这些义齿上花费的平均椅旁时间为467分钟。
带有两颗骨内种植体的下颌覆盖义齿比传统全口义齿具有更好的功能。