Suppr超能文献

幼儿宣誓能力:任务、虐待和年龄的影响。

Young Children's Competency to Take the Oath: Effects of Task, Maltreatment, and Age.

机构信息

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):141-9. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9177-9. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

Abstract

This study examined maltreated and non-maltreated children's (N = 183) emerging understanding of "truth" and "lie," terms about which they are quizzed to qualify as competent to testify. Four- to six-year-old children were asked to accept or reject true and false (T/F) statements, label T/F statements as the "truth" or "a lie," label T/F statements as "good" or "bad," and label "truth" and "lie" as "good" or "bad." The youngest children were at ceiling in accepting/rejecting T/F statements. The labeling tasks revealed improvement with age and children performed similarly across the tasks. Most children were better able to evaluate "truth" than "lie." Maltreated children exhibited somewhat different response patterns, suggesting greater sensitivity to the immorality of lying.

摘要

本研究考察了受虐待和未受虐待儿童(N=183)对“真相”和“谎言”这两个术语的理解,这两个术语是他们有资格作证的关键。研究人员对 4 至 6 岁的儿童进行了测试,要求他们接受或拒绝真实和虚假(T/F)陈述,将 T/F 陈述标记为“真相”或“谎言”,将 T/F 陈述标记为“好”或“坏”,并将“真相”和“谎言”标记为“好”或“坏”。最小的孩子在接受/拒绝 T/F 陈述方面已经达到了上限。标记任务显示出随着年龄的增长而有所提高,并且儿童在各个任务中的表现相似。大多数儿童更善于评估“真相”而非“谎言”。受虐待的儿童表现出的反应模式略有不同,这表明他们对说谎的不道德性更加敏感。

相似文献

6
[Standards for expert assessment of credibility].[可信度专家评估标准]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 1999 May;27(2):121-4. doi: 10.1024//1422-4917.27.2.121.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Social and cognitive correlates of children's lying behavior.儿童说谎行为的社会和认知关联因素。
Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):866-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01164.x.
9
A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge.一种关于隐性知识和显性知识的理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Oct;22(5):735-55; discussion 755-808. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99002186.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验