Snider Carolyn, Lee Jacques
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
CJEM. 2009 Mar;11(2):161-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011131.
Youth violence continues to trouble Canadians. Emergency department (ED) visits by youth after a violent injury may represent a "teachable moment," and thus secondary violence prevention interventions may be effective. We conducted a systematic review to identify the success rates of any interventions, the populations likely to benefit and the outcome measures used.
We searched 8 databases (i.e., MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the ACP Journal Club, DARE and CENTRAL).
Studies were included if they described and evaluated an intervention, were health care-based and targeted youth who were injured by violence. Two blinded investigators selected 15 articles from 181 abstracts. After full-text review, 8 articles were excluded, leaving 7 articles from 4 intervention programs.
All interventions used ED case management of the violently injured patient. One randomized control trial (RCT) demonstrated a significant reduction in reinjury rates (treatment group 8.1% v. control group 20.3%, p = 0.05). Another small RCT found no statistically significant reductions in repeat violence or service use. One retrospective cohort study demonstrated a lower relative risk (RR) in future criminal justice involvement (RR = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.99). A retrospective study of pediatric patients with violent injuries found only 1% of these youth returned with injuries as a result of repeat violence.
Although all 4 case management interventions that we reviewed showed promise in the United States, small sample sizes and incomplete follow-up limited their ability to demonstrate significant decreases in reinjury.
Future research is necessary to help EDs capitalize on the opportunity to effectively reduce youth violence.
青少年暴力问题持续困扰着加拿大人。青少年因暴力受伤后到急诊科就诊可能是一个“可教育的时机”,因此二级暴力预防干预措施可能会有效。我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定任何干预措施的成功率、可能受益的人群以及所使用的结果指标。
我们检索了8个数据库(即医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、医学期刊数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、考克兰系统评价数据库、美国医师协会杂志俱乐部、循证医学数据库和考克兰对照试验中心注册库)。
如果研究描述并评估了一项干预措施,以医疗保健为基础且针对因暴力受伤的青少年,则纳入该研究。两名盲法研究者从181篇摘要中筛选出15篇文章。经过全文审查,排除了8篇文章,最终纳入了来自4个干预项目的7篇文章。
所有干预措施均采用对暴力受伤患者的急诊科病例管理。一项随机对照试验表明再受伤率显著降低(治疗组为8.1%,对照组为20.3%,p = 0.05)。另一项小型随机对照试验发现,重复暴力行为或服务使用方面没有统计学上的显著降低。一项回顾性队列研究表明,未来刑事司法介入的相对风险较低(相对风险 = 0.67,95%置信区间0.45 - 0.99)。一项对暴力受伤儿科患者的回顾性研究发现,这些青少年中只有1%因重复暴力行为再次受伤。
尽管我们审查的所有4种病例管理干预措施在美国都显示出了前景,但样本量小和随访不完整限制了它们证明再受伤显著减少的能力。
未来有必要进行研究,以帮助急诊科利用这一机会有效减少青少年暴力。