• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2%甲哌卡因中的芬太尼与0.5%布比卡因中的芬太尼对比:两项平行对照双盲研究。

Fentanyl in 2% mepivacaine compared with fentanyl in 0.5% bupivacaine: two parallel controlled double blind studies.

作者信息

Boidin M P, Sulimma H, Hamers S E

机构信息

Dept. Anesthesiology, Ignatius Hospital Breda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1991;42(2):93-9.

PMID:1927240
Abstract

The efficacy of epidural mepivacaine and bupivacaine, combined with fentanyl to enhance blockade, was compared in two parallel controlled, double-blind clinical trials. Patients in the studies (n = 91) were scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the legs and a tourniquet was used in all cases. Those patients receiving mepivacaine attended day surgery only, whereas patients receiving bupivacaine were hospitalised. Epidural puncture was performed with a Tuohy needle at the L3-4 level in the lateral decubitus position. Levels of sensory and motor blockade were assessed; adverse reactions and pain during surgery were recorded. There were four groups of patients: 1) 26 received 2% mepivacaine with placebo; 2) 26 received 2% mepivacaine with 0.1 mg fentanyl; 3) 19 received 0.5% bupivacaine with placebo and 4) 20 patients received 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.1 mg fentanyl. The levels of the sensory blockade was comparable in all groups. The degree of motor-blockade was more intense in the mepivacaine groups, but the blockade by mepivacaine lasted shorter. Addition of fentanyl did not change the sensory and motor blockade. Intraoperative pain was reported by: 7 patients in the mepivacaine/placebo group; 4 patients in the mepivacaine/fentanyl group; 4 patients in the bupivacaine/placebo group; and by one patient in the bupivacaine/fentanyl group. These results indicate that fentanyl enhances the quality of epidural blockade when combined with either mepivacaine or bupivacaine.

摘要

在两项平行对照、双盲临床试验中,比较了硬膜外注射甲哌卡因和布比卡因,并联合芬太尼以增强阻滞效果。研究中的患者(n = 91)计划接受腿部骨科手术,所有病例均使用止血带。接受甲哌卡因的患者仅接受日间手术,而接受布比卡因的患者则住院治疗。在侧卧位L3 - 4水平用Tuohy针进行硬膜外穿刺。评估感觉和运动阻滞水平;记录手术期间的不良反应和疼痛情况。患者分为四组:1)26例接受2%甲哌卡因加安慰剂;2)26例接受2%甲哌卡因加0.1mg芬太尼;3)19例接受0.5%布比卡因加安慰剂;4)20例患者接受0.5%布比卡因加0.1mg芬太尼。所有组的感觉阻滞水平相当。甲哌卡因组的运动阻滞程度更强,但甲哌卡因引起的阻滞持续时间较短。添加芬太尼并未改变感觉和运动阻滞情况。术中疼痛报告如下:甲哌卡因/安慰剂组有7例患者;甲哌卡因/芬太尼组有4例患者;布比卡因/安慰剂组有4例患者;布比卡因/芬太尼组有1例患者。这些结果表明,芬太尼与甲哌卡因或布比卡因联合使用时可提高硬膜外阻滞的质量。

相似文献

1
Fentanyl in 2% mepivacaine compared with fentanyl in 0.5% bupivacaine: two parallel controlled double blind studies.2%甲哌卡因中的芬太尼与0.5%布比卡因中的芬太尼对比:两项平行对照双盲研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1991;42(2):93-9.
2
Regression of sensory and motor blockade, and analgesia during continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl in comparison with other local anesthetics.与其他局部麻醉药相比,罗哌卡因和芬太尼持续硬膜外输注期间感觉和运动阻滞的消退以及镇痛情况。
Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):546-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00174.x.
3
Motor and sensory blockade after epidural injection of mepivacaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine--a double-blind study.
Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):739-47.
4
Levobupivacaine plus fentanyl versus racemic bupivacaine plus fentanyl in epidural anaesthesia for lower limb surgery.左旋布比卡因联合芬太尼与消旋布比卡因联合芬太尼用于下肢手术硬膜外麻醉的比较
Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;74(7-8):381-91. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Fentanyl and bupivacaine mixture for extradural blockade in orthopaedic surgery: effects on haemodynamic responses and pain related to the use of thigh tourniquet.芬太尼与布比卡因混合用于骨科手术硬膜外阻滞:对血流动力学反应及大腿止血带使用相关疼痛的影响
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1987 May;4(3):167-74.
6
Combined spinal-epidural analgesia vs. intermittent bolus epidural analgesia for pain relief after major abdominal surgery. A prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial.腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛与间歇性推注硬膜外镇痛用于腹部大手术后疼痛缓解的比较。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;62(2):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01642.x. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
7
A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.单次脊麻最大头端感觉阻滞与腰麻-硬膜外联合技术用于剖宫产的随机试验。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):240-5. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818e0fa6.
8
Epidural volume extension and intrathecal dose requirement: plain versus hyperbaric bupivacaine.硬膜外容积扩展与鞘内给药剂量需求:普通布比卡因与重比重布比卡因的比较
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):333-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181734436.
9
Ropivacaine produces sensory blockade in the lumbar sacral region more frequently than mepivacaine in lower thoracic epidural anesthesia.在胸段硬膜外麻醉中,罗哌卡因比甲哌卡因更常引起腰骶部感觉阻滞。
J Anesth. 2004;18(4):250-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-004-0262-4.
10
Comparison of intrathecal magnesium, fentanyl, or placebo combined with bupivacaine 0.5% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.鞘内注射镁、芬太尼或安慰剂联合0.5%布比卡因用于择期剖宫产产妇的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Mar;53(3):346-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01864.x. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidural fentanyl improves the onset and spread of epidural mepivacaine analgesia.硬膜外给予芬太尼可改善硬膜外注射甲哌卡因镇痛的起效时间及扩散范围。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Dec;43(12):1211-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03013426.