Kanai Akifumi, Osawa Satoru, Suzuki Asaha, Ozawa Akiko, Okamoto Hirotsugu, Hoka Sumio
Department of Anesthesiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kitasato, Sagamihara, Japan.
Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):546-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00174.x.
To compare the regression of sensory and motor blockade, and the analgesia during continuous epidural infusion between ropivacaine and other local anesthetics.
Two studies were conducted. Study 1: Eighty patients were scheduled for orthopedic procedures of the lower extremity under lumbar epidural anesthesia. Following the operation, continuous infusion of a randomized solution (0.2% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.2% ropivacaine with 2.5 microg/mL fentanyl) was commenced at a rate of 6 mL/h. The regression of sensory and motor blockade were compared among the groups. Study 2: After gynecologic abdominal surgery, 39 patients were randomized to one of the three epidural infusion groups: 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, or 0.2% ropivacaine with 2.5 microg/mL fentanyl at a rate of 6 mL/h with an additional bolus injection of 3 mL, which can be used when patients have pain. Visual analog scale (VAS) was compared among the groups.
Study 1: The level of sensory blockade in all the groups appeared to decrease progressively. However, the regression of sensory blockade was significantly prolonged in patients treated with ropivacaine. The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine augmented this prolonged analgesic effect. Study 2: VAS after the bolus in the ropivacaine and the ropivacaine + fentanyl groups were significantly lower than that in the bupivacaine group. Patients in the ropivacaine + fentanyl group required significantly fewer supplemental bolus injections.
Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine may induce a slower regression of sensory blockade compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine. The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine can enhance this prolonged analgesic effect with little effect on motor blockade. Epidural infusion of ropivacaine with fentanyl provides effective pain relief, possibly because of the maintenance of sensory blockade by ropivacaine and fentanyl.
比较罗哌卡因与其他局部麻醉药在连续硬膜外输注期间感觉和运动阻滞的消退情况以及镇痛效果。
进行了两项研究。研究1:80例计划接受下肢骨科手术的患者在腰段硬膜外麻醉下进行手术。术后,以6 mL/h的速率开始连续输注随机分配的溶液(0.2%罗哌卡因、0.125%布比卡因、0.5%利多卡因或含2.5μg/mL芬太尼的0.2%罗哌卡因)。比较各组感觉和运动阻滞的消退情况。研究2:妇科腹部手术后,39例患者被随机分为三个硬膜外输注组之一:0.2%罗哌卡因、0.125%布比卡因或含2.5μg/mL芬太尼的0.2%罗哌卡因,以6 mL/h的速率输注,并额外推注3 mL,患者疼痛时可使用。比较各组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。
研究1:所有组的感觉阻滞水平似乎逐渐降低。然而,罗哌卡因治疗的患者感觉阻滞的消退明显延长。罗哌卡因中加入芬太尼增强了这种延长的镇痛效果。研究2:罗哌卡因组和罗哌卡因+芬太尼组推注后的VAS显著低于布比卡因组。罗哌卡因+芬太尼组的患者需要的补充推注次数明显更少。
与布比卡因和利多卡因相比,连续硬膜外输注罗哌卡因可能导致感觉阻滞的消退更慢。罗哌卡因中加入芬太尼可增强这种延长的镇痛效果且对运动阻滞影响较小。硬膜外输注罗哌卡因加芬太尼可有效缓解疼痛,可能是由于罗哌卡因和芬太尼维持了感觉阻滞。