Suppr超能文献

关节穿刺术与非手术方法治疗不可复性颞下颌关节盘移位的比较

Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the treatment of temporomandibular disc displacement without reduction.

作者信息

Diraçoğlu Demirhan, Saral Ilknur Bayraktar, Keklik Bariş, Kurt Hanefi, Emekli Ufuk, Ozçakar Levent, Karan Ayşe, Aksoy Cihan

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jul;108(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the short- and medium-term results of arthrocentesis and conventional treatment (splint, heat, and exercise) in patients with early temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDw/oR).

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred twenty consecutive patients (104 female, 16 male), who had been followed by a multidisciplinary TMJ unit with the diagnosis of DDw/oR were enrolled in this single-blind prospective study. Patients either underwent arthrocentesis or they were given a combination of splint, hot pack, and home exercise program. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment. Maximal mouth opening (MMO), lateral movement, and protrusion were measured. Repeat measurements were performed on the first, third, and sixth months following treatments.

RESULTS

Arthrocentesis group consisted of 54 individuals (51 female, 3 male), and the conventional treatment group consisted of 56 individuals (49 female, 7 male). The mean age values of the groups were 33.4 years (range 15-63 years) and 34.8 years (range 17-61 years), respectively. Baseline VAS and MMO values of the arthrocentesis and conventional treatment groups were similar (P > .05). Regarding VAS and MMO, lateral movement, and protrusion, the intragroup analyses showed a statistically significant reduction in both groups compared with baseline values (all P < .01). Regarding VAS values, the difference values between each evaluation and the baseline measurement were significantly higher in the arthrocentesis group, except for the first-month difference. Regarding MMO, lateral movements, and protrusion, the differences between the baseline values and each evaluation thereafter were statistically similar between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that early treatment either with conservative methods or with arthrocentesis is beneficial in DDw/oR. However, arthrocentesis seems to be superior regarding pain management. Therefore, arthrocentesis may be indicated in patients where painful complaints overwhelm despite other conservative treatments.

摘要

目的

比较关节穿刺术与传统治疗方法(夹板、热敷和运动)对早期颞下颌关节(TMJ)不可复性盘移位(DDw/oR)患者的短期和中期疗效。

研究设计

本单盲前瞻性研究纳入了120例连续患者(104例女性,16例男性),这些患者均由多学科颞下颌关节诊疗单元诊断为DDw/oR。患者要么接受关节穿刺术,要么接受夹板、热敷和家庭锻炼计划的联合治疗。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛。测量最大开口度(MMO)、侧向运动和前伸运动。在治疗后的第1、3和6个月进行重复测量。

结果

关节穿刺术组有54例患者(51例女性,3例男性),传统治疗组有56例患者(49例女性,7例男性)。两组的平均年龄分别为33.4岁(范围15 - 63岁)和34.8岁(范围17 - 61岁)。关节穿刺术组和传统治疗组的基线VAS和MMO值相似(P >.05)。关于VAS和MMO、侧向运动和前伸运动,组内分析显示两组与基线值相比均有统计学意义的降低(所有P <.01)。关于VAS值,除了第1个月的差异外,关节穿刺术组每次评估与基线测量的差值均显著高于传统治疗组。关于MMO、侧向运动和前伸运动,两组基线值与之后每次评估的差异在统计学上相似(P >.05)。

结论

我们得出结论,早期采用保守方法或关节穿刺术治疗DDw/oR均有益。然而,关节穿刺术在疼痛管理方面似乎更具优势。因此,对于尽管接受了其他保守治疗但疼痛症状仍很严重的患者,可考虑采用关节穿刺术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验