Lutgers H L, Gerrits E G, Graaff R, Links T P, Sluiter W J, Gans R O, Bilo H J, Smit A J
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Diabetologia. 2009 May;52(5):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1308-9. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine has become a standard for cardiovascular risk assessment in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Skin autofluorescence was recently introduced as an alternative tool for cardiovascular risk assessment in diabetes. We investigated the prognostic value of skin autofluorescence for cardiovascular events in combination with the UKPDS risk engine in a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes managed in primary care.
Clinical, UKPDS risk engine and skin autofluorescence data were obtained at baseline in 2001-2002 in the type 2 diabetes group (n = 973). Follow-up data concerning fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (primary endpoint) were obtained till 2005. Patients were classified as 'low risk' when their 10 year UKPDS risk score for fatal cardiovascular events was <10%, and 'high risk' if >10%. Skin autofluorescence was measured non-invasively with an autofluorescence reader. Skin autofluorescence was classified by the median (i.e. low risk < median, high risk > median).
The incidence of cardiovascular events was 119 (44 fatal, 75 non-fatal). In multivariate analysis, skin autofluorescence, age, sex and diabetes duration were predictors for the primary endpoint. Addition of skin autofluorescence information to that from the UKPDS risk engine resulted in re-classification of 55 of 203 patients from the low-risk to the high-risk group. The 10 year cardiovascular event rate was higher in patients with a UKPDS score >10% when skin autofluorescence was above the median (55.8% vs 38.9%).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Skin autofluorescence provides additional information to the UKPDS risk engine which can result in risk re-classification of a substantial number of patients. It furthermore identifies patients who have a particularly high risk for developing cardiovascular events.
目的/假设:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)风险评估模型已成为2型糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险评估的标准。皮肤自发荧光最近被用作糖尿病患者心血管疾病风险评估的替代工具。我们在一组接受初级保健的2型糖尿病患者中,研究了皮肤自发荧光联合UKPDS风险评估模型对心血管事件的预测价值。
2001 - 2002年在2型糖尿病组(n = 973)中获取基线时的临床、UKPDS风险评估模型和皮肤自发荧光数据。直至2005年获取有关致命和非致命心血管事件(主要终点)的随访数据。当患者10年UKPDS致命心血管事件风险评分<10%时分类为“低风险”,>10%时为“高风险”。使用自发荧光读取器对皮肤自发荧光进行无创测量。皮肤自发荧光按中位数分类(即低风险<中位数,高风险>中位数)。
心血管事件发生率为119例(44例致命,75例非致命)。多因素分析中,皮肤自发荧光、年龄、性别和糖尿病病程是主要终点的预测因素。将皮肤自发荧光信息添加到UKPDS风险评估模型中,导致203例患者中的55例从低风险组重新分类为高风险组。当皮肤自发荧光高于中位数时,UKPDS评分>10%的患者10年心血管事件发生率更高(55.8%对38.9%)。
结论/解读:皮肤自发荧光为UKPDS风险评估模型提供了额外信息,可导致大量患者的风险重新分类。此外,它还能识别出发生心血管事件风险特别高的患者。