Mocellin Simone
Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2009 Mar;9(2):214-36. doi: 10.2174/156800909787581015.
Despite the improved understanding of nitric oxide (NO) biology and the large amount of preclinical experiments testing its role in cancer development and progression, it is still debated whether NO should be considered a potential anticancer agent or instead a carcinogen. The complexity of NO effects within a cell and the variability of the final biological outcome depending upon NO levels makes it highly challenging to determine the therapeutic value of interfering with the activity of this intriguing gaseous messenger. This uncertainty has so far halted the clinical implementation of NO-based therapeutics in the field of oncology. Accordingly, only an in depth knowledge of the mechanisms leading to experimental tumor regression or progression in response to NO will allow us to exploit this molecule to fight cancer.
尽管对一氧化氮(NO)生物学的认识有所提高,并且有大量临床前实验测试其在癌症发生和发展中的作用,但NO究竟应被视为一种潜在的抗癌剂还是致癌物仍存在争议。细胞内NO效应的复杂性以及最终生物学结果因NO水平而异,使得确定干扰这种有趣的气态信使活性的治疗价值极具挑战性。到目前为止,这种不确定性阻碍了基于NO的疗法在肿瘤学领域的临床应用。因此,只有深入了解导致实验性肿瘤对NO产生消退或进展反应的机制,才能让我们利用这种分子来对抗癌症。