Buckelew Susan P, DeGood Douglas E, Roberts Kristyn D, Butkovic Jessica D, MacKewn Angie S
Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, TN 38238, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009 Jun;34(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9080-7. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
This study was designed to test a disregulation model of sleep deprivation by assessing the ability of good sleepers compared to poor sleepers to shift daytime EEG patterning to changing environmental demands. Ten good and ten poor sleepers were identified from a sample of 110 college students who completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI). EEG and SCR were recorded during a five task assessment session, including: (1) pre-baseline, (2) eyes open at rest, (3) eyes closed at rest, (4) sensory attentiveness (listening to an audio book clip), and (5) cognitive effort (a higher level cognitive flexibility task). A significant Group x Task interaction, F (3, 16) = 4.81, p = . 01 was attained on the theta data. Specifically, for good sleepers, theta decreased from the "eyes open at rest" to the "sensory attentiveness" tasks, while poor sleepers showed the opposite pattern. This pattern of theta suppression was found in 70% of the good sleepers and only 20% of the poor sleepers. No between group differences were noted in the SCR data, supporting a brain disregulation model, rather than a general psychophysiological stress model.
本研究旨在通过评估睡眠良好者与睡眠不佳者将白天脑电图模式转变以适应不断变化的环境需求的能力,来测试睡眠剥夺的失调模型。从110名完成匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)的大学生样本中确定了10名睡眠良好者和10名睡眠不佳者。在一个包含五项任务的评估环节中记录脑电图和皮肤电反应,这五项任务包括:(1)基线前,(2)静息睁眼,(3)静息闭眼,(4)感觉注意力(听一段有声读物片段),以及(5)认知努力(一项更高水平的认知灵活性任务)。在θ波数据上获得了显著的组×任务交互作用,F(3, 16)= 4.81,p = 0.01。具体而言,对于睡眠良好者,θ波从“静息睁眼”任务到“感觉注意力”任务时下降,而睡眠不佳者则呈现相反的模式。70%的睡眠良好者出现了这种θ波抑制模式,而睡眠不佳者中只有20%出现了这种模式。在皮肤电反应数据中未发现组间差异,这支持了大脑失调模型,而非一般的心理生理应激模型。