Cheung Winston, Milliss David, Thanakrishnan Govindasamy, Anderson Rachel, Tan Jeffrey Th
Intensive Care Unit, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Mar;11(1):28-33.
To determine whether the introduction of a weekly multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) to a general intensive care unit improved selected clinical indicators of patient outcome, and staff satisfaction with patient care.
A single-centre, observational, before-and-after study.
A 14-bed general ICU in an urban, tertiary teaching hospital.
All patients admitted to the ICU during June-December 2006 (before the intervention) and June- December 2007 (after the intervention), and staff employed in the ICU in December 2006 and December 2007.
Introduction of a weekly MDTM to the ICU.
The primary outcome was the number of patients who stayed in the ICU longer than 5 days. Secondary outcomes included nurses' scores for satisfaction with patient care on a questionnaire; ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation; readmissions to the ICU within 72 hours of discharge; and after-hours discharges.
There were 376 ICU admissions in the "before" period and 432 in the "after" period. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for a lower proportion of patients admitted directly to the ICU from the operating theatres in the after period (34.2% v 45.2%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in any of the primary or secondary outcomes, with the exception of one questionnaire score: a fall in the score nursing staff gave for value of all meetings held in the ICU following the introduction of the MDTM (from 6.6 to 3.9 on a scale of 0-10, P = 0.001).
The introduction of a weekly MDTM to a general ICU did not improve selected clinical indicators of patient outcome or staff satisfaction with patient care.
确定在综合重症监护病房引入每周一次的多学科团队会议(MDTM)是否能改善选定的患者预后临床指标以及工作人员对患者护理的满意度。
单中心、观察性前后对照研究。
城市三级教学医院中一个拥有14张床位的综合重症监护病房。
2006年6月至12月(干预前)和2007年6月至12月(干预后)入住重症监护病房的所有患者,以及2006年12月和2007年12月在重症监护病房工作的工作人员。
在重症监护病房引入每周一次的多学科团队会议。
主要结局是在重症监护病房停留超过5天的患者数量。次要结局包括护士在问卷上对患者护理满意度的评分;重症监护病房和医院的死亡率;机械通气时间;出院后72小时内再次入住重症监护病房的情况;以及非工作时间出院情况。
“干预前”期间有376例患者入住重症监护病房,“干预后”期间有432例。两组的基线特征相似,但干预后直接从手术室入住重症监护病房的患者比例较低(34.2%对45.2%,P = 0.002)。除了一项问卷评分外,主要和次要结局均无显著差异:引入多学科团队会议后,护理人员对重症监护病房所有会议价值的评分下降(从0至10分的6.6分降至3.9分,P = 0.001)。
在综合重症监护病房引入每周一次的多学科团队会议并未改善选定的患者预后临床指标或工作人员对患者护理的满意度。