Schilling Ulf Martin
Emergency Department, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(3):131-4. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32831cf605.
In Sweden the public health system is subject of increasing budget problems. Medical training in Sweden does not yet focus on the cost aspects in patients diagnoses and treatment.
This study was carried out to survey the general knowledge among physicians working in the emergency department about the cost of the usual diagnostic tests used in ruling out pulmonary embolism.
Knowledge about costs among Swedish physicians was evaluated in the context of the emergency department of a university hospital. Thirty physicians answered an anonymous questionnaire about the costs for several items used in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Answers within +/-25% of the real costs were regarded as correct. Evaluation took into consideration the physicians' specialty and experience as emergency physician, house officer or consultant in internal medicine. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Student's t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test where applicable. Probability levels of less than 0.05 were accepted as significant.
Mean deviation to the real cost was 52% with a correct estimation of an average 28%. No significant difference could be detected in this study among emergency department physicians, house officers and consultants in internal medicine regarding the cost awareness towards the items considered.
Generally cost awareness was considered low among all participating doctors. The level of experience seemed not to be related to better knowledge about prices. Younger doctors generally tended to underestimate the costs of investigation. Further education will be necessary to raise the level of cost awareness among hospital doctors.
在瑞典,公共卫生系统面临着日益严重的预算问题。瑞典的医学培训尚未关注患者诊断和治疗中的成本因素。
本研究旨在调查急诊科医生对排除肺栓塞常用诊断检查费用的一般了解情况。
在一家大学医院的急诊科对瑞典医生的成本知识进行评估。30名医生回答了一份关于肺栓塞诊断中几项检查费用的匿名问卷。答案在实际成本的±25%范围内被视为正确。评估考虑了医生作为急诊科医生、住院医师或内科顾问的专业和经验。在适用的情况下,使用学生t检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。概率水平小于0.05被认为具有显著性。
与实际成本的平均偏差为52%,平均正确估计率为28%。在本研究中,急诊科医生、住院医师和内科顾问对所考虑项目的成本意识方面未发现显著差异。
总体而言,所有参与研究的医生的成本意识都较低。经验水平似乎与对价格的更好了解无关。年轻医生通常倾向于低估检查成本。有必要进行进一步教育以提高医院医生的成本意识水平。