Applegate W B, Graney M J, Miller S T, Elam J T
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Am J Public Health. 1991 Oct;81(10):1302-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.10.1302.
In a recent randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of an inpatient geriatric assessment unit (GAU), we demonstrated that patients assigned to the unit were less likely than those in the usual care group to be admitted to a nursing home and more likely to remain living in the community. Despite evidence of benefits of GAU care, questions remain about its cost. We examine the impact of GAU treatment on subsequent health care charges.
Sequential referrals of elderly disabled patients considered at risk for institutionalization or likely to improve with rehabilitation were randomized to the GAU or to usual care. Charge data were collected on utilization of a wide variety of health care services starting at the point of randomization.
The group randomized to the GAU experienced significantly higher rehabilitation charges per participant ($10,583 vs $2066, P = .0001), but lower mean nursing home charges ($1798 vs $3426, P = .004). Total health care charges per participant over the 1 year follow-up were greater for the GAU group ($28,406 vs $16,444, P = .004). When charges were adjusted per year of life survived, the GAU group still showed a substantial (but nonsignificant, P = .10) increase in total charges. However, when charges were adjusted per day subsequently spent residing in the community, adjusted total charges were similar between the two groups.
Our results indicated that improved outcomes from GAU care require an investment in rehabilitation that is not totally offset by decreased institutional charges in the following year.
在最近一项评估住院老年评估单元(GAU)疗效的随机对照试验中,我们证明,被分配到该单元的患者比接受常规护理的患者入住养老院的可能性更小,且更有可能继续居住在社区。尽管有证据表明GAU护理有益,但关于其成本的问题依然存在。我们研究了GAU治疗对后续医疗费用的影响。
将被认为有机构化风险或可能通过康复改善的老年残疾患者按顺序转诊,随机分为GAU组或常规护理组。从随机分组时开始收集关于各种医疗服务利用情况的费用数据。
随机分配到GAU组的参与者每人的康复费用显著更高(10,583美元对2066美元,P = 0.0001),但平均养老院费用更低(1798美元对3426美元,P = 0.004)。在1年的随访期内,GAU组每位参与者的总医疗费用更高(28,406美元对16,444美元,P = 0.004)。当按存活的生命年数调整费用时,GAU组的总费用仍有大幅(但不显著,P = 0.10)增加。然而,当按随后在社区居住的天数调整费用时,两组的调整后总费用相似。
我们的结果表明,GAU护理带来的更好结果需要在康复方面进行投资,而这不会被次年机构费用的减少完全抵消。