Du Qi-Shi, Huang Ri-Bo, Wang Cheng-Hua, Li Xiao-Ming, Chou Kuo-Chen
Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jul 7;259(1):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
Understanding the mechanism of the M2 proton channel of influenza A is crucially important to both basic research and drug discovery. Recently, the structure was determined independently by high-resolution NMR and X-ray crystallography. However, the two studies lead to completely different drug-binding mechanisms: the X-ray structure shows the drug blocking the pore from inside; whereas the NMR structure shows the drug inhibiting the channel from outside by an allosteric mechanism. Which one of the two is correct? To address this problem, we conducted an in-depth computational analysis. The conclusions drawn from various aspects, such as energetics, the channel-gating dynamic process, the pK(a) shift and its impact on the channel, and the consistency with the previous functional studies, among others, are all in favour to the allosteric mechanism revealed by the NMR structure. The findings reported here may stimulate and encourage new strategies for developing effective drugs against influenza A, particularly in dealing with the drug-resistant problems.
了解甲型流感病毒M2质子通道的机制对于基础研究和药物研发都至关重要。最近,通过高分辨率核磁共振(NMR)和X射线晶体学分别确定了其结构。然而,这两项研究得出了完全不同的药物结合机制:X射线结构显示药物从内部阻塞孔道;而NMR结构显示药物通过变构机制从外部抑制通道。两者中哪一个是正确的呢?为了解决这个问题,我们进行了深入的计算分析。从能量学、通道门控动态过程、pK(a) 位移及其对通道的影响以及与先前功能研究的一致性等各个方面得出的结论,都支持NMR结构所揭示的变构机制。本文报道的研究结果可能会激发并鼓励开发抗甲型流感有效药物的新策略,特别是在应对耐药性问题方面。