Suppr超能文献

个体对全球 CHD 风险的反应:一项焦点小组研究。

Individuals' responses to global CHD risk: a focus group study.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7110, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore how individuals respond to global coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and use it in combination with treatment information to make decisions to initiate and maintain risk reducing strategies.

METHODS

We conducted four focus groups of individuals at risk for CHD (n=29), purposively sampling individuals with each of several risk factors. Two reviewers coded verbatim transcripts and arbitrated differences, using ATLAS.ti 5.2 to facilitate analysis.

RESULTS

Participants generally regarded the concept of global CHD risk as useful and motivating, although had questions about its precision and comprehensiveness. They identified several additional influential factors in decision-making (e.g. achievable risk, the quickness and self-evidence of results) and generally preferred lifestyle changes to medications (although most would accept medications under certain circumstances). They also noted the importance of participating in decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore the motivating potential of global CHD risk and the importance of patient participation in decision-making.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Global CHD risk is a useful adjunct to CHD prevention and can be presented in ways, and with information, that might improve CHD outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨个体如何应对全球冠心病(CHD)风险,并将其与治疗信息结合起来,做出启动和维持降低风险策略的决策。

方法

我们对 29 名有 CHD 风险的个体进行了 4 组焦点小组(n=29),有意对具有多种风险因素的个体进行了抽样。两位评审员使用 ATLAS.ti 5.2 对逐字记录进行编码并仲裁差异,以促进分析。

结果

参与者普遍认为全球 CHD 风险的概念是有用且有激励性的,尽管对其准确性和全面性存在疑问。他们在决策中确定了几个额外的影响因素(例如,可实现的风险、结果的快速性和直观性),并且普遍倾向于生活方式的改变而不是药物治疗(尽管大多数人在某些情况下会接受药物治疗)。他们还注意到参与决策的重要性。

结论

我们的结果强调了全球 CHD 风险的激励潜力以及患者参与决策的重要性。

实践意义

全球 CHD 风险是 CHD 预防的有用辅助手段,可以以改善 CHD 结果的方式呈现,并提供相关信息。

相似文献

1
Individuals' responses to global CHD risk: a focus group study.个体对全球 CHD 风险的反应:一项焦点小组研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

4
Risk of coronary artery disease in celiac disease population.乳糜泻人群中冠状动脉疾病的风险。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):253-258. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_616_16.

本文引用的文献

6
A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats.不同形式呈现治疗益处效果的荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):638-54. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306783. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验