Lalor J M, Ortiz J C, Holdcroft A
Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London.
Anaesthesia. 1991 Sep;46(9):762-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09774.x.
An automatically pressurised infusor system, the Alton Dean infusor, has been compared with two types (cloth and plastic) of commonly used pneumatically pressurised bags. All the infusors had reasonably accurate pressure gauges but pressure could only be consistently maintained with the cloth infusors or with the Alton Dean infusors when connected to a compressed air supply. Sequential fast infusions were possible with all infusors, but simultaneous infusions could be limited in number when the pressure infusor was connected directly to pipeline gas. One of the Alton Dean pressure infusors tested had a leak in the pressurisation system, and the pressure adjustment valves were difficult to manipulate. These may require modification.
一种自动加压输液器系统——奥尔顿·迪恩输液器，已与两种常用的气动加压袋（布质和塑料质）进行了比较。所有输液器都有相当准确的压力表，但只有布质输液器或连接到压缩空气供应源的奥尔顿·迪恩输液器才能持续保持压力。所有输液器都可以进行连续快速输注，但当压力输液器直接连接到管道气体时，同时输注的数量可能会受到限制。测试的一台奥尔顿·迪恩压力输液器的加压系统存在泄漏，且压力调节阀难以操作。这些可能需要改进。
