• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

百特弹性泵:称重作为目视检查的替代方法。

Baxter elastomeric pumps: Weighing as an alternative to visual inspection.

作者信息

Cusano Ellen L, Ali Raafi, Sawyer Michael B, Chambers Carole R, Tang Patricia A

机构信息

1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

2 Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018 Apr;24(3):163-169. doi: 10.1177/1078155216687153. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1177/1078155216687153
PMID:28077048
Abstract

Purpose Elastomeric pumps are used to administer 46-hour infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Baxter suggests patients visually monitor their pumps to ensure that infusions are proceeding correctly. This can be confusing and lead to concerns about under- or over-dosing. Baxter has not considered weighing pumps as a validated method for monitoring. This study aims to validate weighing as a more accurate method for patients and healthcare professionals, and describe real life Baxter Infusor™ variability. Methods Patients who had been started on a 46-hour 5FU infusion returned to the clinic approximately 24 h after starting treatment. The pump was weighed on a StarFrit kitchen scale, and date, time, and weights recorded. Patients were asked if they had a preference for weighing or visually inspecting their pump. Results Pumps ( n = 103) were weighed between 17.25 and 27.5 h after connection. The average weight of a pump was 189 g. Of 103 pumps weighed, 99 weighed less than expected, corresponding to average flow rates of 5.69 mL/h over the elapsed time. The expected flow rate is 5 mL/h with 10% variability. Average flow rates within the 17.25- to 27.5-hour window were 4.561 mL/h, which is 8.78% slower than expected, but within the 10% known variability. Forty-seven percent of patients didn't have a preference for either method, but for those who did have a preference, more than twice as many preferred weighing. Conclusion With proper education, weighing Baxter Infusors at home with kitchen scales can be an accepted and objective alternative to the current recommendation of visual inspection.

摘要

目的 弹性泵用于进行46小时的5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)输注。百特公司建议患者目视监测其泵,以确保输注过程正确。这可能会造成混淆,并引发对剂量不足或过量的担忧。百特公司尚未将称量泵作为一种经过验证的监测方法。本研究旨在验证称量作为一种对患者和医护人员而言更准确的方法,并描述实际使用中的百特输液器™的变异性。方法 开始进行46小时5FU输注的患者在开始治疗后约24小时返回诊所。使用StarFrit厨房秤称量泵,并记录日期、时间和重量。询问患者他们更喜欢称量还是目视检查他们的泵。结果 在连接后17.25至27.5小时之间称量了泵(n = 103)。一个泵的平均重量为189克。在称量的103个泵中,99个的重量低于预期,对应于在经过的时间内平均流速为5.69毫升/小时。预期流速为5毫升/小时,变异性为10%。在17.25至27.5小时窗口内的平均流速为4.561毫升/小时,比预期慢8.78%,但在已知的10%变异性范围内。47%的患者对两种方法都没有偏好,但对于那些有偏好的患者,更喜欢称量的人数是更喜欢目视检查的人数的两倍多。结论 通过适当的教育,在家中使用厨房秤称量百特输液器可以成为当前目视检查建议的一种可接受且客观的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Baxter elastomeric pumps: Weighing as an alternative to visual inspection.百特弹性泵:称重作为目视检查的替代方法。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018 Apr;24(3):163-169. doi: 10.1177/1078155216687153. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Baxter elastomeric pumps: Feasibility of weight estimates.百特弹性泵:重量估计的可行性。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2017 Sep;23(6):429-435. doi: 10.1177/1078155216656928. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Elastomeric pump reliability in postoperative regional anesthesia: a survey of 430 consecutive devices.术后区域麻醉中弹性泵的可靠性:对430台连续使用设备的调查。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2079-84. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318187c9bb.
4
An assessment of the performance of the Baxter elastomeric (LV10) Infusor™ pump under hyperbaric conditions.对百特弹性体(LV10)输注泵™在高压条件下性能的评估。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2017 Mar;47(1):33-37. doi: 10.28920/dhm47.1.33-37.
5
Protocol for a randomised crossover trial to evaluate patient and nurse satisfaction with electronic and elastomeric portable infusion pumps for the continuous administration of antibiotic therapy in the home: the Comparing Home Infusion Devices (CHID) study.一项随机交叉试验方案,旨在评估患者和护士对用于家庭中持续抗生素治疗的电子和弹性便携式输液泵的满意度:比较家庭输液设备(CHID)研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):e016763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016763.
6
Effects of flow rate accuracy in two-day anticancer drug infusion with disposable pumps on plasma drug concentrations.两种一次性输液泵在两天抗癌药物输注中流量准确性对血浆药物浓度的影响。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(3):1351-1360. doi: 10.3233/THC-230227.
7
Performance of the Baxter Infusor LV10 under hyperbaric conditions.百特LV10输液泵在高压条件下的性能。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2015 Mar;45(1):37-41.
8
Unreliability of weighing elastomeric pumps for determining volume of fluid infused.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Apr 15;72(8):602, 604. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140556.
9
A randomized crossover trial assessing patient preference for two different types of portable infusion-pump devices.一项评估患者对两种不同类型便携式输液泵设备偏好的随机交叉试验。
Ann Oncol. 1999 Jun;10(6):727-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1008334313918.
10
Comparison of three intravenous infusion pumps for monoplace hyperbaric chambers.三种用于单人高压氧舱的静脉输液泵的比较
Undersea Hyperb Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;32(6):451-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory chemotherapy: Past, present, and future.门诊化疗:过去、现在和未来。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021 Jun;27(4):962-973. doi: 10.1177/1078155220985916. Epub 2021 Jan 18.