Bonfiglioli R, Farioli A, Mattioli S, Violante F S
Medicina del lavoro, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Via P. Palagi, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jul-Sep;30(3 Suppl):26-31.
To evaluate interventions for primary prevention of Upper limb Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (UWMSD) we conducted a literature search from the biomedical database Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Occupational Health Field. A total of 41 studies were selected: the majority investigated the effect of interventions among office workers, few involved industrial workplaces. Studies were characterized by a wide range of interventions (engineering, administrative, ergonomic training) and methodological heterogeneity (in the study design and outcome measures). Only four studies examine interventions for the prevention of specific outcomes (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome). At present, the multidimensional approach of interventions and the poor outcome definitions hamper the isolation of the potentially effective component of the intervention. Future intervention studies should be based on well defined risk assessment and outcome measures, rigorous and long-term study design. Only strong levels of evidence could be the base of policy recommendations.
为评估上肢工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病(UWMSD)一级预防的干预措施,我们从生物医学数据库Medline和Cochrane协作网职业健康领域进行了文献检索。共筛选出41项研究:大多数研究调查了办公室工作人员中干预措施的效果,少数涉及工业工作场所。这些研究的特点是干预措施种类繁多(工程、行政、工效学培训)且方法存在异质性(在研究设计和结局测量方面)。仅有四项研究考察了预防特定结局(腕管综合征和手臂振动综合征)的干预措施。目前,干预措施的多维度方法以及结局定义不完善阻碍了对潜在有效干预成分的分离。未来的干预研究应基于明确的风险评估和结局测量、严谨且长期的研究设计。只有强有力的证据水平才能作为政策建议的依据。