Lötters Freek, Burdof Alex
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct;75(8):549-61. doi: 10.1007/s00420-002-0368-7. Epub 2002 Aug 21.
The purpose of this review is to present more insight into the effects of primary interventions on both mechanical exposure and musculoskeletal health and to determine whether these outcomes are good performance indicators of such interventions.
The literature was scrutinised for relevant references. Primary prevention was defined as any activity aimed at preventing the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders in occupational populations. Primary outcome measures were mechanical exposure, musculoskeletal health, and sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. The impact of interventions was assessed by calculating the reduction in mechanical exposure and the preventable fraction (PF) of the musculoskeletal complaints. After selection, 40 studies were included for further analysis.
In general, of the 40 included studies, 29 (73%) found a reduction in musculoskeletal symptoms (PF range 0.10-0.95). Eighteen out of 29 studies (62%) reported a statistically significant reduction in musculoskeletal disorders. In 12 of the 40 studies (30%) changes in both mechanical exposure and musculoskeletal health were used as performance indicators for the intervention. Of these studies nine (67%) showed a reduction in both mechanical exposure (range 14%-87% reduction) and musculoskeletal disorders or sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (PF range 0.15-0.92). From these nine it was seen that a reduction of at least 14% in mechanical exposure resulted in a concomitant reduction in musculoskeletal health.
More quantitative information is needed to describe the relationship between mechanical exposure and musculoskeletal health as presented in the model. In this case it is recommended that in primary intervention studies not only changes in health outcomes be measured but also changes in mechanical exposure along the pathway of the intervention. In this way a better insight will be gained about the dose-response relationships between exposure to physical-load risk factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD). More insight into these relationships will eventually lead to more efficient implementations of primary intervention strategies.
本综述的目的是更深入地了解初级干预对机械性暴露和肌肉骨骼健康的影响,并确定这些结果是否是此类干预的良好性能指标。
对文献进行仔细审查以寻找相关参考文献。初级预防被定义为旨在预防职业人群中肌肉骨骼疾病发生的任何活动。主要结局指标为机械性暴露、肌肉骨骼健康以及因肌肉骨骼疾病导致的病假。通过计算机械性暴露的减少量和肌肉骨骼疾病的可预防比例(PF)来评估干预措施的影响。经过筛选,纳入40项研究进行进一步分析。
总体而言,在纳入的40项研究中,29项(73%)发现肌肉骨骼症状有所减轻(PF范围为0.10 - 0.95)。29项研究中有18项(62%)报告肌肉骨骼疾病有统计学意义的减轻。在40项研究中的12项(30%)中,机械性暴露和肌肉骨骼健康的变化均被用作干预措施的性能指标。在这些研究中,9项(67%)显示机械性暴露(减少范围为14% - 87%)以及肌肉骨骼疾病或因肌肉骨骼疾病导致的病假(PF范围为0.15 - 0.92)均有所减少。从这9项研究中可以看出,机械性暴露至少减少14%会导致肌肉骨骼健康随之改善。
需要更多定量信息来描述模型中呈现的机械性暴露与肌肉骨骼健康之间的关系。在这种情况下,建议在初级干预研究中不仅要测量健康结局的变化,还要测量干预路径上机械性暴露的变化。通过这种方式,将能更好地了解身体负荷风险因素暴露与工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病(WRMSD)之间的剂量反应关系。对这些关系有更多了解最终将导致初级干预策略的更有效实施。