• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[工作适应性判断与法医学方面]

[Judgement of fitness to work and forensic-medical aspects].

作者信息

L'Abbate N, Giovanazzi A

机构信息

Sezione di Medicina del Lavoro, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e del Lavoro, Università degli Studi di Foggia, Via Luigi Pinto c/o OO.RR., 71100 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jul-Sep;30(3 Suppl):144-8.

PMID:19288809
Abstract

The occupational physician, specifically trained in radiation protection, has to consider different criteria, such as psycho-physical ability, biological fitness and worker's validity to formulate judgement of fitness to work in exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). According to National Legislations (D.Lgs. 230/95; DM 488/2001), there are different possible outcomes about fitness to work criteria: absolutely fit to work, partially fit to work, not fit to work and medical examination before workers exposed to IR's retirement; besides, the occupational physician has to pay particular attention to evaluate individual hypersusceptibility conditions. Stochastic somatic diseases require a "not fit to work" judgement, an occupational disease complaint to the Insurance Institute and a report obligation. Forensic-medical ascertainment of diseases caused by radiation exposure needs different criteria, particularly for stochastic effects. The most suitable criterion, applied to attribute etiologic role in stochastic effects, is "Probability of Causation" theory, deriving from scientific literature evidence. This theory is an epidemiology-based method conceived to evaluate the probability of a linkage between a specified cancer and an exposure. Judgement of fitness to work in case of neoplasia partial or complete remission should be based on objective considerations, giving particular importance to the human and social aspects.

摘要

职业医师经过辐射防护方面的专门培训,必须考虑不同标准,如心理 - 身体能力、生理健康状况和劳动者的有效性,以对从事电离辐射(IR)暴露工作的健康适宜性作出判断。根据国家法规(D.Lgs. 230/95;DM 488/2001),关于工作适宜性标准有不同的可能结果:完全适合工作、部分适合工作、不适合工作以及在从事电离辐射工作的劳动者退休前进行医学检查;此外,职业医师必须特别注意评估个体的超敏反应情况。随机性躯体疾病需要作出“不适合工作”的判断、向保险机构提出职业病投诉以及履行报告义务。对辐射暴露所致疾病进行法医鉴定需要不同标准,尤其是针对随机效应。应用于确定随机效应病因作用的最合适标准是“因果概率”理论,该理论源于科学文献证据。这一理论是一种基于流行病学的方法,旨在评估特定癌症与某种暴露之间存在关联的概率。对于肿瘤部分或完全缓解情况下的工作适宜性判断应基于客观考量,尤其要重视人文和社会方面。

相似文献

1
[Judgement of fitness to work and forensic-medical aspects].[工作适应性判断与法医学方面]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2008 Jul-Sep;30(3 Suppl):144-8.
2
Fitness for work: the SIMLII Health Surveillance Guidelines.工作适应性:SIMLII健康监测指南
Med Lav. 2006 May-Jun;97(3):491-500.
3
[Criteria and modalities of assessment of work fitness for jobs in food industry].
Med Lav. 1999 May-Jun;90(3):473-83.
4
Disability and work: fitness for work judgement.残疾与工作:工作适应性判断
Med Lav. 2006 May-Jun;97(3):501-8.
5
[Regulation and duties for the radiation protection physician in medical surveillance of exposed to AOR].[放射防护医师在对接受航空辐射人员进行医学监测中的职责与规范]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2011 Jul-Sep;33(3 Suppl):395-8.
6
[Primary prevention in medical surveillance of workers exposed to ionizing radiations: personalized dose limit].[对暴露于电离辐射的工人进行医学监测中的一级预防:个性化剂量限值]
Med Lav. 2007 Sep-Oct;98(5):381-406.
7
Radiation in the workplace-a review of studies of the risks of occupational exposure to ionising radiation.工作场所中的辐射——职业性接触电离辐射风险研究综述
J Radiol Prot. 2009 Jun;29(2A):A61-79. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S05. Epub 2009 May 19.
8
[Work capacity evaluation: the final step of health surveillance].工作能力评估:健康监测的最后一步
Med Lav. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(4):227-38.
9
The evaluation of pulmonary fitness and risk.肺功能与风险评估。
Occup Med. 1988 Apr-Jun;3(2):285-98.
10
[Judgment on work capacity of a health worker with schizophrenia].
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2004 Jul-Sep;26(3):187-90.