Christie Janice, O'Halloran Peter, Stevenson Mike
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):128-34. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181900cb5.
The standard approach in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to randomize individuals to intervention and control groups. Yet, nursing and other health interventions are often implemented at the levels of health service organizational unit or geographical area. It may be more appropriate to conduct a cluster RCT. However, cluster randomization requires consideration of a number of important issues.
The objective of this study was to show how critical issues in relation to design and analysis can be addressed.
Two cluster RCTs conducted by the authors are used as examples. Guidance on the conduct and reporting of cluster RCTs is also offered.
A rationale for choosing this design was provided, and issues in relation to study design, calculation of sample size, and statistical analysis were clarified. A decision tree and checklist are provided to guide researchers through essential steps in conducting a cluster RCT.
Cluster RCTs present special challenges in relation to design, conduct, and analysis. Nevertheless, they are an appropriate and potentially powerful tool for nursing research. With careful attention to the issues addressed in this article, researchers can use this approach successfully.
随机对照试验(RCT)的标准方法是将个体随机分配到干预组和对照组。然而,护理及其他健康干预措施通常是在卫生服务组织单位或地理区域层面实施的。进行整群随机对照试验可能更为合适。然而,整群随机化需要考虑一些重要问题。
本研究的目的是展示如何解决与设计和分析相关的关键问题。
作者进行的两项整群随机对照试验被用作示例。同时还提供了关于整群随机对照试验实施和报告的指导。
提供了选择该设计的基本原理,并阐明了与研究设计、样本量计算和统计分析相关的问题。提供了一个决策树和清单,以指导研究人员完成整群随机对照试验的基本步骤。
整群随机对照试验在设计、实施和分析方面存在特殊挑战。尽管如此,它们仍是护理研究中一种合适且可能强大的工具。通过仔细关注本文所涉及的问题,研究人员可以成功使用这种方法。