• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.头孢丙烯(BMY - 28100)与头孢克洛治疗急性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的疗效及安全性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jun;35(6):1127-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.6.1127.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus penicillin, cefaclor and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis.头孢丙烯与青霉素、头孢克洛及红霉素治疗链球菌性咽炎和扁桃体炎的疗效及安全性比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):846-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02111351.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil and cefaclor in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.头孢丙烯与头孢克洛治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的疗效及安全性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Oct;28(4):581-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.4.581.
4
Treatment of pharyngitis and tonsillitis with cefprozil: review of three multicenter trials.用头孢丙烯治疗咽炎和扁桃体炎:三项多中心试验综述
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14 Suppl 2:S224-30; discussion S231-2. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.supplement_2.s224.
5
Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.头孢丙烯。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Feb;45(2):295-317. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00008.
6
Azithromycin versus cefaclor in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.阿奇霉素与头孢克洛治疗儿童A组β溶血性链球菌急性扁桃体咽炎的疗效比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Apr;17(4):235-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01699979.
7
Cefprozil versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute and uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Cefprozil Multicenter Study Group.头孢丙烯与头孢克洛治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的对比研究。头孢丙烯多中心研究组
Clin Ther. 1992 Mar-Apr;14(2):314-26.
8
Open-Label, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized study of cefprozil versus erythromycin in children with group A streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis.头孢丙烯与红霉素治疗A组链球菌性咽炎/扁桃体炎患儿的开放标签、平行组、多中心随机研究。
Clin Ther. 2001 Nov;23(11):1889-900. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)89084-0.
9
Comparative efficacy and safety of 5-day cefaclor and 10-day amoxycillin treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in children.儿童 A 组链球菌性咽炎 5 天头孢克洛治疗与 10 天阿莫西林治疗的疗效和安全性比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jul;20(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00118-8.
10
Cefprozil versus penicillin V in treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.头孢丙烯与青霉素V治疗链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的对比
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Aug;37(8):1620-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.8.1620.

引用本文的文献

1
Redefining the management of pediatric tonsillopharyngitis with cefprozil.用头孢丙烯重新定义小儿扁桃体咽炎的治疗。
Indian J Pediatr. 2007 Dec;74(12):1105-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-007-0206-8.
2
Antibacterial-induced hepatotoxicity. Incidence, prevention and management.抗菌药物所致肝毒性。发生率、预防及管理
Drug Saf. 1996 Jul;15(1):79-85. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615010-00007.
3
Adverse effects of newer cephalosporins. An update.新型头孢菌素的不良反应。最新进展。
Drug Saf. 1993 Aug;9(2):132-42. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199309020-00005.
4
Cefprozil versus penicillin V in treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.头孢丙烯与青霉素V治疗链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的对比
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Aug;37(8):1620-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.8.1620.
5
Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.头孢丙烯。对其抗菌活性、药代动力学特性及治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1993 Feb;45(2):295-317. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00008.

本文引用的文献

1
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS CARRIER STATE IN THE TREATMENT OF DISEASE DUE TO GROUP A STREPTOCOCCI.金黄色葡萄球菌携带状态在A组链球菌所致疾病治疗中的意义
N Engl J Med. 1964 Dec 31;271:1395-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196412312712705.
2
The role of beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in the persistence of streptococcal tonsillar infection.产β-内酰胺酶细菌在链球菌性扁桃体感染持续存在中的作用。
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Sep-Oct;6(5):601-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.5.601.
3
Importance of patient compliance in effective antimicrobial therapy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Oct;6(10):971-5. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198710000-00036.
4
In vitro activity of BMY-28100 against common isolates from pediatric infections.BMY-28100对儿科感染常见分离株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Apr;31(4):630-1. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.4.630.
5
In vitro activity of BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin.新型口服头孢菌素BMY - 28100的体外活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Apr;31(4):653-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.4.653.
6
Comparative antibacterial activity of a new oral cephalosporin, BMY-28100.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100的抗菌活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Mar;31(3):480-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.3.480.
7
BMY-28100, a new oral cephalosporin: antimicrobial activity against nearly 7,000 recent clinical isolates, comparative potency with other oral agents, and activity against beta-lactamase producing isolates.新型口服头孢菌素BMY-28100:对近7000株近期临床分离菌株的抗菌活性、与其他口服制剂的相对效价以及对产β-内酰胺酶分离菌株的活性
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Jan;9(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90056-9.
8
BMY 28100, a new oral cephalosporin.BMY 28100,一种新型口服头孢菌素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):238-43. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.2.238.
9
Comparison of oral cephalosporins with penicillin therapy for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;5(6):649-54. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198611000-00010.
10
Comparison of cefprozil and cefaclor pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration.头孢丙烯与头孢克洛的药代动力学及组织穿透性比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jun;34(6):1204-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.6.1204.

头孢丙烯(BMY - 28100)与头孢克洛治疗急性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的疗效及安全性比较

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.

作者信息

Christenson J C, Swenson E, Gooch W M, Herrod J N

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jun;35(6):1127-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.6.1127.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.35.6.1127
PMID:1929253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC284298/
Abstract

Cefprozil (BMY-28100) is a semisynthetic cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and prolonged serum elimination half-life allowing for once-a-day oral administration. In vitro, cefprozil demonstrates excellent activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefprozil (500 mg once daily) was compared to cefaclor (250 mg three times daily) in an open, randomized, comparative trial for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study; 53 patients were evaluable for clinical and bacteriological response assessment. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for safety assessment. Three patients (all in the cefprozil treatment group) required disenrollment because of side effects, mainly nausea. Clinical and bacteriological responses were comparable for both study drugs. Leukopenia and nausea, the most common side effects observed, were more common in the cefprozil-treated group. Cefprozil appears to be an appropriate alternative to cefaclor for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. However, because of the small number of patients eligible for efficacy assessment, a large type II (beta) error was expected in our study, which may have resulted in a potential failure to detect a difference between both treatment groups. A larger study would be required to determine the proper role of cefprozil in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections.

摘要

头孢丙烯(BMY - 28100)是一种具有广谱抗菌活性且血清消除半衰期延长的半合成头孢菌素,可每日口服一次。在体外,头孢丙烯对金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和卡他莫拉菌表现出优异的活性。在一项治疗急性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的开放、随机、对照试验中,将头孢丙烯(每日500毫克)与头孢克洛(每日250毫克,分三次服用)进行了比较。94名患者参与了本研究;53名患者可进行临床和细菌学反应评估。78名患者可进行安全性评估。3名患者(均在头孢丙烯治疗组)因副作用(主要是恶心)而退出研究。两种研究药物的临床和细菌学反应相当。观察到的最常见副作用白细胞减少和恶心在头孢丙烯治疗组中更常见。头孢丙烯似乎是治疗急性A组β溶血性链球菌咽炎的头孢克洛的合适替代药物。然而,由于符合疗效评估的患者数量较少,预计本研究中会出现较大的II型(β)错误,这可能导致未能检测到两个治疗组之间的差异。需要进行更大规模的研究来确定头孢丙烯在治疗A组β溶血性链球菌感染中的恰当作用。