Suppr超能文献

评估呼气甲烷作为便秘型肠易激综合征的诊断试验。

Evaluating breath methane as a diagnostic test for constipation-predominant IBS.

机构信息

GI Motility Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite 225E, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Feb;55(2):398-403. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0778-4. Epub 2009 Mar 18.

Abstract

Studies suggest that subjects with IBS have altered gut flora. Among these findings, methane production is more commonly associated with constipation-predominant symptoms. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the role of methane as a diagnostic test. Consecutive Rome I positive IBS patients referred for a lactulose breath test were eligible to participate. After exclusion criteria, subjects completed a symptom questionnaire grading bloating, diarrhea, and constipation on a VAS scale (0-100 mm). Once completed, a physician interviewed the subjects and rated the subject accordingly, and also determined whether the patient had C-IBS, D-IBS, or neither. Subjects and physicians were blinded to the results of the breath test. The presence of methane in the breath test was compared to the results of the scoring by subjects and physicians. A total of 56 Rome I positive IBS subjects were enrolled. During breath testing, 28 subjects produced methane. Good agreement between physician's evaluation and the patient's was seen (diarrhea = 0.69; constipation = 0.69; bloating = 0.62). The severity of constipation was noted to be greater in the methane group (49.3 +/- 28.7) than in the non-methane group (25.3 +/- 31.47) (P < 0.01). In contrast, diarrhea was less severe in the methane group (12.3 +/- 21.0) than the non-methane group (36.7 +/- 32.4) (P < 0.01). Out of the 56 patients, 23 C-IBS subjects were identified by the physician. When methane was used to predict the assignment of C-IBS compared to non-C-IBS, it had a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 81.3% (OR = 47.7, CI = 9.4-232, P < 0.00001). In conclusion, methane is a potential diagnostic test for the identification of C-IBS and may guide treatment.

摘要

研究表明,IBS 患者的肠道菌群发生了改变。在这些发现中,甲烷的产生与以便秘为主的症状更为相关。在这项研究中,我们前瞻性地评估了甲烷作为诊断测试的作用。符合 Rome I 阳性 IBS 标准并被推荐进行乳果糖呼气试验的患者有资格参与。排除标准后,患者完成了一份症状问卷,用 VAS 量表(0-100mm)对腹胀、腹泻和便秘进行评分。完成后,医生对患者进行了访谈并进行了相应的评分,同时确定患者是否患有 C-IBS、D-IBS 或两者都没有。患者和医生对呼气试验的结果均不知情。比较了呼气试验中甲烷的存在与患者和医生评分的结果。共纳入 56 例 Rome I 阳性 IBS 患者。在呼气试验中,28 例患者产生了甲烷。医生评估与患者自评之间存在良好的一致性(腹泻=0.69;便秘=0.69;腹胀=0.62)。甲烷组的便秘严重程度(49.3+/-28.7)明显高于非甲烷组(25.3+/-31.47)(P<0.01)。相反,甲烷组的腹泻严重程度(12.3+/-21.0)明显低于非甲烷组(36.7+/-32.4)(P<0.01)。在 56 例患者中,有 23 例被医生诊断为 C-IBS 患者。当使用甲烷来预测 C-IBS 与非 C-IBS 的分配时,它的敏感性为 91.7%,特异性为 81.3%(OR=47.7,CI=9.4-232,P<0.00001)。总之,甲烷可能是一种潜在的 C-IBS 诊断测试,可用于指导治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验