Suppr超能文献

便秘型肠易激综合征的抗生素治疗。

Antibiotic treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

机构信息

GI Motility Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA,

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Jun;59(6):1278-85. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3157-8. Epub 2014 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The antibiotic rifaximin is used to treat non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methane production is associated with constipation and its severity in constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). A previous retrospective study suggested that rifaximin and neomycin was superior to neomycin alone in improving symptoms in methane-positive subjects.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness of neomycin alone or with rifaximin in improving symptoms in methane-positive C-IBS subjects.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed from 2010 to 2013 at three tertiary care centers. Subjects aged 18-65 with C-IBS (Rome II criteria) and breath methane (>3 ppm) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Subjects completed a baseline symptom questionnaire rating the severity of abdominal and bowel symptoms on a visual analog scale and were randomized to receive neomycin and placebo or neomycin and rifaximin for 14 days. Symptom severity was assessed by weekly questionnaire for 2 weeks of therapy and 4 additional weeks of follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-one subjects (16 neomycin and placebo, 15 neomycin and rifaximin) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Constipation severity was significantly lower in the neomycin and rifaximin group (28.6 ± 30.8) compared to neomycin alone (61.2 ± 24.1) (P = 0.0042), with greater improvement in constipation (P = 0.007), straining (P = 0.017) and bloating (P = 0.020), but not abdominal pain. In the neomycin and rifaximin group, subjects with methane <3 ppm after treatment reported significantly lower constipation severity (30.5 ± 21.8) than subjects with persistent methane (67.2 ± 32.1) (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Rifaximin plus neomycin is superior to neomycin alone in improving multiple C-IBS symptoms. This effect is predicted by a reduction in breath methane.

摘要

背景

抗生素利福昔明用于治疗非便秘型肠易激综合征(IBS)。甲烷的产生与便秘及其在以便秘为主的肠易激综合征(C-IBS)中的严重程度有关。先前的回顾性研究表明,利福昔明联合新霉素比单独使用新霉素更能改善甲烷阳性受试者的症状。

目的

确定单独使用新霉素或联合利福昔明治疗甲烷阳性 C-IBS 受试者的有效性。

方法

2010 年至 2013 年,在三个三级护理中心进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。招募了符合纳入和排除标准的年龄在 18-65 岁之间的以便秘为主的 IBS(罗马 II 标准)和呼气甲烷(>3ppm)的甲烷阳性受试者。受试者在基线时完成症状问卷,用视觉模拟量表评估腹部和肠道症状的严重程度,并随机接受新霉素和安慰剂或新霉素和利福昔明治疗 14 天。在治疗的 2 周和 4 周的随访中,每周通过问卷评估症状严重程度。

结果

31 名受试者(16 名接受新霉素和安慰剂,15 名接受新霉素和利福昔明)被纳入意向治疗分析。与单独使用新霉素相比,新霉素和利福昔明组的便秘严重程度显著降低(28.6±30.8)(P=0.0042),便秘(P=0.007)、排便费力(P=0.017)和腹胀(P=0.020)均有显著改善,但腹痛无改善。在新霉素和利福昔明组中,治疗后呼气甲烷<3ppm 的受试者报告的便秘严重程度(30.5±21.8)明显低于持续呼气甲烷的受试者(67.2±32.1)(P=0.020)。

结论

利福昔明联合新霉素在改善多种 C-IBS 症状方面优于单独使用新霉素。这种效果可通过呼气甲烷的减少来预测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验