Durga Padmaja, Jonnavittula Nirmala, Muthuchellappan Radhakrishnan, Ramachandran Gopinath
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, AP, India.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Apr;21(2):161-4. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181920d18.
Direct invasive arterial monitoring is performed routinely for all major neurosurgical procedures. Systolic pressure variation (SPV) used, independently or in combination with central venous pressure (CVP) allows optimal fluid management in hypovolemia and hemorrhage. This study aims to quantify SPV during graded hypovolemia using the simple technique described by Gouvea and Gouvea using Datex Ohmeda S/5, and to compare its reliability relative to other hemodynamic indicators of hypovolemia. Twenty anesthetized neurosurgical patients of ASA grade I and II patients were administered furosemide 0.5 mg/kg intravenously to obtain graded volume loss in the form of urine output. Invasive arterial pressure from radial artery and CVP were monitored using Datex OhmedaS/5 (Finland). Invasive arterial pressure label was changed to pulmonary artery label with the scale appropriate for arterial pressure. The trace was frozen in the wedge mode to reduce the sweep speed and the cursor was used to measure SPV and pulse pressure variation (PPV). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, CVP at zero end-expiratory pressure, SPV and PPV are measured at baseline, and after a urine output of 200 and 500 mL. There was a significant correlation between volume loss and CVP, SPV, and PPV. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic analysis was >0.75 for CVP, SPV, and PPV. SPV of 7.5 mm Hg and a change of SPV by 4.5 mm Hg, a PPV of 4.5 and change in PPV by 2.5 mm Hg were the best cut-off values that corresponded to a volume change of 500 mL. This simple method enabled calculation of SPV without the computerized modules, and detected volume loss comparable to CVP.
所有重大神经外科手术均常规进行直接有创动脉监测。单独使用或与中心静脉压(CVP)联合使用的收缩压变异(SPV)可实现低血容量和出血时的最佳液体管理。本研究旨在使用Gouvea和Gouvea描述的简单技术,通过Datex Ohmeda S/5在分级低血容量期间对SPV进行量化,并将其与其他低血容量血流动力学指标的可靠性进行比较。对20例ASA I级和II级的麻醉神经外科患者静脉注射0.5 mg/kg呋塞米,以尿量形式获得分级容量丢失。使用Datex OhmedaS/5(芬兰)监测桡动脉的有创动脉压和CVP。将有创动脉压标签更改为适合动脉压的肺动脉标签。在楔入模式下冻结波形以降低扫描速度,并用光标测量SPV和脉压变异(PPV)。在基线、尿量达到200和500 mL后,测量心率、收缩压、舒张压、呼气末零压力时的CVP、SPV和PPV。容量丢失与CVP、SPV和PPV之间存在显著相关性。CVP、SPV和PPV的受试者操作特征分析曲线下面积>0.75。SPV为7.5 mmHg且SPV变化4.5 mmHg、PPV为4.5且PPV变化2.5 mmHg是与500 mL容量变化相对应的最佳截断值。这种简单方法无需计算机模块即可计算SPV,并能检测到与CVP相当的容量丢失。