• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无补片双层缝合修复原发性和复发性中线切口疝的复发率低。

Low recurrence rate of a two-layered closure repair for primary and recurrent midline incisional hernia without mesh.

作者信息

Dur A H M, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W E, Kreis R W, Lange J F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Vondellaan 13, Beverwijk 1942 LE, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0487-0. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-009-0487-0
PMID:19296196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a serious complication after abdominal surgery and occurs in 11-23% of laparotomies. Repair can be done, for instance, with a direct suture technique, but recurrence rates are high. Recent literature advises the use of mesh repair. In contrast to this development, we studied the use of a direct suture repair in a separate layer technique. The objective of this retrospective observational study is to assess the outcomes (recurrences and complications) of a two-layered open closure repair for primary and recurrent midline incisional hernia without the use of mesh.

METHODS

In an observational retrospective cohort study, we analysed the hospital and outpatient records of 77 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a primary or recurrent incisional hernia between 1st May 2002 and 8th November 2006. The repair consisted of separate continuous suturing of the anterior and posterior fascia, including the rectus muscle, after extensive intra-abdominal adhesiolysis.

RESULTS

Forty-one men (53.2%) and 36 women (46.8%) underwent surgery. Sixty-three operations (81.8%) were primary repairs and 14 (18.2%) were repairs for a recurrent incisional hernia. Of the 66 patients, on physical examination, three had a recurrence (4.5%) after an average follow-up of 2.6 years. The 30-day postoperative mortality was 1.1%. Wound infection was seen in five patients (6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A two-layered suture repair for primary and recurrent incisional hernia repair without mesh with extensive adhesiolysis was associated with a recurrence rate comparable to mesh repair and had an acceptable complication rate.

摘要

背景

切口疝是腹部手术后的一种严重并发症,在剖腹手术患者中发生率为11%-23%。例如,可以采用直接缝合技术进行修复,但复发率较高。近期文献建议使用补片修补术。与这一发展趋势相反,我们研究了在单独层次技术中使用直接缝合修复的方法。这项回顾性观察性研究的目的是评估在不使用补片的情况下,两层开放式缝合修复原发性和复发性中线切口疝的疗效(复发率和并发症)。

方法

在一项观察性回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2002年5月1日至2006年11月8日期间连续接受原发性或复发性切口疝手术的77例患者的住院和门诊记录。修复方法包括在广泛的腹腔内粘连松解术后,对包括腹直肌在内的前、后筋膜进行单独连续缝合。

结果

41名男性(53.2%)和36名女性(46.8%)接受了手术。63例手术(81.8%)为初次修复,14例(18.2%)为复发性切口疝修复。在66例患者中,体格检查发现,平均随访2.6年后,3例复发(4.5%)。术后30天死亡率为1.1%。5例患者(6.5%)出现伤口感染。

结论

在不使用补片且进行广泛粘连松解的情况下,两层缝合修复原发性和复发性切口疝,其复发率与补片修补术相当,并发症发生率可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/0b8c2c34744a/10029_2009_487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/353bb896fa6f/10029_2009_487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/73d1b3556132/10029_2009_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/9a3796057e16/10029_2009_487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/0b8c2c34744a/10029_2009_487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/353bb896fa6f/10029_2009_487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/73d1b3556132/10029_2009_487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/9a3796057e16/10029_2009_487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d846/2719741/0b8c2c34744a/10029_2009_487_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Low recurrence rate of a two-layered closure repair for primary and recurrent midline incisional hernia without mesh.无补片双层缝合修复原发性和复发性中线切口疝的复发率低。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0487-0. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
2
Open Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair made simple and successful but not for everyone.开放性里夫斯-斯托帕腹疝修补术操作简单且成功率高,但并非适用于所有人。
Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):162-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0319-9. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
3
[Management of complicated incisional hernias with underlay-technique implanted polypropylene mesh. An effective technique in French hernia surgery].[采用补片下层植入聚丙烯补片技术治疗复杂切口疝。法国疝外科的一种有效技术]
Chirurg. 1998 Jul;69(7):766-72. doi: 10.1007/s001040050488.
4
[Management of large abdominal wall hernias with foreign implant materials (Gore-Tex patch)].使用异体植入材料(戈尔泰克斯补片)治疗巨大腹壁疝
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(10):879-84.
5
Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.切口疝缝合修补与补片修补随机对照试验的长期随访
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7.
6
Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.与桥接生物补片修复腹壁重建相比,采用生物补片加强的一期筋膜闭合术并发症和复发率更低:一项倾向评分分析。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Adverse events, quality of life, and recurrence rates after laparoscopic adhesiolysis and recurrent incisional hernia mesh repair in patients with previous failed repairs.既往修补失败患者行腹腔镜粘连松解术及复发性切口疝补片修补术后的不良事件、生活质量和复发率
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):663-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.330. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
8
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
10
Components separation combined with abdominal wall plication for repair of large abdominal wall hernias following bariatric surgery.组件分离联合腹壁折叠术用于减重手术后大型腹壁疝的修复。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May;119(6):1792-1798. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000259096.99745.cf.

引用本文的文献

1
Incisional Hernia After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Importance of Avoiding the Linea Alba.经皮内镜下胃造口管置入术后切口疝:避免白线的重要性。
ACG Case Rep J. 2019 Jul 16;6(7):e00120. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000120. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Unusual complications of incisional hernia.切口疝的罕见并发症。
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Nov;4(6):971-4. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.144930.
3
Early outcome of incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh: A preliminary report.使用聚丙烯网片修补切口疝的早期结果:初步报告。

本文引用的文献

1
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
2
Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: "components separation technique" versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial.巨大中线腹壁疝修补术:“成分分离技术”与假体修补术的随机对照试验中期分析
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):756-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x.
3
Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual.
Niger Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):333-7. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.137197.
4
A comparative study of sutured versus bovine pericardium mesh abdominal closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放腹主动脉瘤修复术后缝合与牛心包补片腹部闭合的比较研究。
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1262-4. Epub 2014 May 13.
5
Improved outcomes in the management of high-risk incisional hernias utilizing biological mesh and soft-tissue reconstruction: a single center experience.利用生物补片和软组织重建改善高危切口疝的治疗效果:单中心经验
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1026-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2442-6.
6
One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study.切口疝治疗后 1 年随访:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Hernia. 2010 Dec;14(6):575-82. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0686-8. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
7
Isokinetic strength of the trunk flexor muscles after surgical repair for incisional hernia.手术修复切口疝后躯干屈肌等速肌力。
Hernia. 2010 Jun;14(3):243-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0627-6. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Emergency treatment of complicated incisional hernias: a case study.复杂切口疝的急诊治疗:病例研究
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2009 Dec 17;3:15. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-3-15.
腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的汇总数据分析:14年患者数据积累
Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):378-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
4
Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery.切口疝:腹部手术的早期并发症。
World J Surg. 2005 Dec;29(12):1608-13. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7929-3.
5
Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair.比较轻质复合补片与聚酯或聚丙烯补片用于切口疝修补的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2005 Dec;92(12):1488-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5208.
6
Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的围手术期结局与并发症
Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):708-15; discussion 715-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054.
7
Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia.腹壁闭合及随后切口疝形成的相关因素。
Surgeon. 2003 Feb;1(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80004-5.
8
Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.切口疝缝合修补与补片修补随机对照试验的长期随访
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7.
9
Wound complications and stitch length.伤口并发症与缝线长度
Hernia. 2004 Feb;8(1):39-41. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0159-4. Epub 2003 Sep 6.
10
Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture or mesh.缝线或补片修补切口疝的成本分析
Hernia. 2003 Sep;7(3):114-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0119-z. Epub 2003 Feb 8.